2004•The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal MedicineRequires access

Efficacy of an acidic vaginal gel on vaginal pH and interleukin-6 levels in low-risk pregnant women: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

Delia Maria Paternoster, Lucija Tudor, Massimo Milani, Tiziano Maggino, Antonio Ambrosini

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and a vaginal pH of > 4.7 are associated with obstetric complications such as preterm delivery and low birth weight. Topical treatments, able to maintain a physiological vaginal pH, could help in the prevention of vaginal infections. STUDY AIM: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the effects of an acidic buffering vaginal gel (Miphil) on vaginal pH and IL-6 levels in pregnant women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy low-risk women pregnant with a singleton (second trimester) were enrolled in the trial. Thirty-five were randomized to the acidic gel, 2.5 g every 3 days for 12 weeks, and 35 to the corresponding placebo. Vaginal pH and vaginal IL-6 level were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Women were then followed until delivery. The main outcome measures were vaginal pH, vaginal pH normalization (pH < 4.5) and vaginal IL-6 levels. RESULTS: Vaginal pH at baseline was 4.6 +/- 0.4 and 4.4 +/- 0.3 in the acidic gel and the placebo group, respectively. At baseline, a total of 40% (14/35) and 22% (8/35) of women in each group, respectively, had a vaginal pH of > or = 4.7. At week 12, the vaginal pH was 4.3 +/- 0.3 in the acidic gel group and 4.3 +/- 0.3 in the placebo group (NS). The acidic gel normalized the vaginal pH in ten out of 14 women (p = 0.04) in comparison with only one out of eight women in the placebo group (NS). The acidic gel induced a significant (p < 0.02) reduction of vaginal IL-6 from 12.0 +/- 7 to 8.9 +/- 5 pg/l (-36%). In the placebo group, IL-6 increased from 9.0 +/- 5 to 13.5 +/- 6.8 pg/l (+50%) (p = 0.05). Birth weight was 2978 +/- 700 g in the placebo group and 3241 +/- 477 g in the acidic gel group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the acidic gel in low-risk pregnant women is able to maintain a physiological vaginal ecosystem and prevents the increases of vaginal pH and vaginal IL-6. Prospective and controlled trials are warranted to evaluate whether this acidic gel can reduce obstetric complications linked to vaginal inflammation during pregnancy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Increased interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and a vaginal pH of > 4.7 are associated with obstetric complications such as preterm delivery and low birth weight. Topical treatments, able to maintain a physiological vaginal pH, could help in the prevention of vaginal infections. STUDY AIM: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the effects of an acidic buffering vaginal gel (Miphil) on vaginal pH and IL-6 levels in pregnant women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy low-risk women pregnant with a singleton (second trimester) were enrolled in the trial. Thirty-five were randomized to the acidic gel, 2.5 g every 3 days for 12 weeks, and 35 to the corresponding placebo. Vaginal pH and vaginal IL-6 level were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Women were then followed until delivery. The main outcome measures were vaginal pH, vaginal pH normalization (pH < 4.5) and vaginal IL-6 levels. RESULTS: Vaginal pH at baseline was 4.6 +/- 0.4 and 4.4 +/- 0.3 in the acidic gel and the placebo group, respectively. At baseline, a total of 40% (14/35) and 22% (8/35) of women in each group, respectively, had a vaginal pH of > or = 4.7. At week 12, the vaginal pH was 4.3 +/- 0.3 in the acidic gel group and 4.3 +/- 0.3 in the placebo group (NS). The acidic gel normalized the vaginal pH in ten out of 14 women (p = 0.04) in comparison with only one out of eight women in the placebo group (NS). The acidic gel induced a significant (p < 0.02) reduction of vaginal IL-6 from 12.0 +/- 7 to 8.9 +/- 5 pg/l (-36%). In the placebo group, IL-6 increased from 9.0 +/- 5 to 13.5 +/- 6.8 pg/l (+50%) (p = 0.05). Birth weight was 2978 +/- 700 g in the placebo group and 3241 +/- 477 g in the acidic gel group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the acidic gel in low-risk pregnant women is able to maintain a physiological vaginal ecosystem and prevents the increases of vaginal pH and vaginal IL-6. Prospective and controlled trials are warranted to evaluate whether this acidic gel can reduce obstetric complications linked to vaginal inflammation during pregnancy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and a vaginal pH of > 4.7 are associated with obstetric complications such as preterm delivery and low birth weight. Topical treatments, able to maintain a physiological vaginal pH, could help in the prevention of vaginal infections. STUDY AIM: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the effects of an acidic buffering vaginal gel (Miphil) on vaginal pH and IL-6 levels in pregnant women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy low-risk women pregnant with a singleton (second trimester) were enrolled in the trial. Thirty-five were randomized to the acidic gel, 2.5 g every 3 days for 12 weeks, and 35 to the corresponding placebo. Vaginal pH and vaginal IL-6 level were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Women were then followed until delivery. The main outcome measures were vaginal pH, vaginal pH normalization (pH < 4.5) and vaginal IL-6 levels. RESULTS: Vaginal pH at baseline was 4.6 +/- 0.4 and 4.4 +/- 0.3 in the acidic gel and the placebo group, respectively. At baseline, a total of 40% (14/35) and 22% (8/35) of women in each group, respectively, had a vaginal pH of > or = 4.7. At week 12, the vaginal pH was 4.3 +/- 0.3 in the acidic gel group and 4.3 +/- 0.3 in the placebo group (NS). The acidic gel normalized the vaginal pH in ten out of 14 women (p = 0.04) in comparison with only one out of eight women in the placebo group (NS). The acidic gel induced a significant (p < 0.02) reduction of vaginal IL-6 from 12.0 +/- 7 to 8.9 +/- 5 pg/l (-36%). In the placebo group, IL-6 increased from 9.0 +/- 5 to 13.5 +/- 6.8 pg/l (+50%) (p = 0.05). Birth weight was 2978 +/- 700 g in the placebo group and 3241 +/- 477 g in the acidic gel group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the acidic gel in low-risk pregnant women is able to maintain a physiological vaginal ecosystem and prevents the increases of vaginal pH and vaginal IL-6. Prospective and controlled trials are warranted to evaluate whether this acidic gel can reduce obstetric complications linked to vaginal inflammation during pregnancy.

Key concepts: Placebo, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Vagina, Pregnancy, Intravaginal administration, Gynecology, Obstetrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of an acidic vaginal gel on vaginal pH and interleukin-6 levels in low-risk pregnant women: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens