Income Distribution and Dualism: The Case of Kenya
Mwangi wa Gîthînji
Abstract
Mwangi wa Gîthînji
Abstract
Development economics has been dominated by the use of dualistic models of the economy. This study investigates whether the stylized facts that emanate from models, such as those of Sir Arthur Lewis and Harris and Todaro, arerelevant in examining issues of income distribution. Based on an examination of Kenyan household data, estimates of the distribution are compared with the stylized facts and past estimates. It is found that while the focus onrural–urban differences that arises from the dualistic models is justifiable, this concern with the spatial duality has led to the neglect of intrasectorial inequality, particularly rural inequality.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Development economics has been dominated by the use of dualistic models of the economy. This study investigates whether the stylized facts that emanate from models, such as those of Sir Arthur Lewis and Harris and Todaro, arerelevant in examining issues of income distribution. Based on an examination of Kenyan household data, estimates of the distribution are compared with the stylized facts and past estimates. It is found that while the focus onrural–urban differences that arises from the dualistic models is justifiable, this concern with the spatial duality has led to the neglect of intrasectorial inequality, particularly rural inequality.
Key concepts: Stylized fact, Dualism, Economics, Income distribution, Neglect, Inequality, Distribution (mathematics), Economic inequality