1996•Canadian Journal of ZoologyRequires access

Forage intake rates of ruffed grouse and potential effects on grouse density

David Glenn Hewitt, Roy L. Kirkpatrick

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

One hypothesis to explain low densities of ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in the southeastern United States is that available winter forages in the Southeast require more time to harvest than forages eaten in the central portions of the species' range, where grouse densities are greater. Longer foraging times could increase mortality rates through greater predation risk and higher energy expenditure. To test this hypothesis, we conducted trials with captive ruffed grouse to determine their maximum instantaneous rates of intake of various forages and used the results to estimate minimum foraging times for southeastern ruffed grouse consuming an average winter diet. Grouse in the Southeast must forage for > 100 min to meet their energy demands. Ruffed grouse in the central portion of the range rely heavily on aspen (Populus sp.) buds during the winter and can consume the same amount of metabolizable energy in 30–50 min. Thus, we present evidence that ruffed grouse in the southeastern United States must forage for longer periods to meet daily energy demands and therefore may experience higher winter mortality rates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One hypothesis to explain low densities of ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in the southeastern United States is that available winter forages in the Southeast require more time to harvest than forages eaten in the central portions of the species' range, where grouse densities are greater. Longer foraging times could increase mortality rates through greater predation risk and higher energy expenditure. To test this hypothesis, we conducted trials with captive ruffed grouse to determine their maximum instantaneous rates of intake of various forages and used the results to estimate minimum foraging times for southeastern ruffed grouse consuming an average winter diet. Grouse in the Southeast must forage for > 100 min to meet their energy demands. Ruffed grouse in the central portion of the range rely heavily on aspen (Populus sp.) buds during the winter and can consume the same amount of metabolizable energy in 30–50 min. Thus, we present evidence that ruffed grouse in the southeastern United States must forage for longer periods to meet daily energy demands and therefore may experience higher winter mortality rates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One hypothesis to explain low densities of ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in the southeastern United States is that available winter forages in the Southeast require more time to harvest than forages eaten in the central portions of the species' range, where grouse densities are greater. Longer foraging times could increase mortality rates through greater predation risk and higher energy expenditure. To test this hypothesis, we conducted trials with captive ruffed grouse to determine their maximum instantaneous rates of intake of various forages and used the results to estimate minimum foraging times for southeastern ruffed grouse consuming an average winter diet. Grouse in the Southeast must forage for > 100 min to meet their energy demands. Ruffed grouse in the central portion of the range rely heavily on aspen (Populus sp.) buds during the winter and can consume the same amount of metabolizable energy in 30–50 min. Thus, we present evidence that ruffed grouse in the southeastern United States must forage for longer periods to meet daily energy demands and therefore may experience higher winter mortality rates.

Key concepts: Grouse, Forage, Foraging, Predation, Biology, Range (aeronautics), Ecology, Energy expenditure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Forage intake rates of ruffed grouse and potential effects on grouse density — Research Paper | ScholarLens