2005CABI eBooksRequires access

Periphyton as biological indicators in managed aquatic ecosystems.

Sergi Sabater, Wim Admiraal

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on the pros and cons of using periphyton (phototrophic biofilms) as monitoring tools in natural and managed aquatic ecosystems. The structural (biomass, community composition) and physiological (pigment composition, photosynthesis) descriptors of periphyton are critically examined to evaluate their use as biological indicators. Different responses of biofilms to physical, chemical and biological disturbances (e.g. extreme water pH and excess nutrients) are discussed. An annotated list of the methods used for monitoring managed aquatic systems using periphyton is given. The range of methods presented includes methods to determine the general state of biofilms/periphyton as well as specific methods in relation to growth or structure. A combination of methods can be made depending on the type of information required.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This paper focuses on the pros and cons of using periphyton (phototrophic biofilms) as monitoring tools in natural and managed aquatic ecosystems. The structural (biomass, community composition) and physiological (pigment composition, photosynthesis) descriptors of periphyton are critically examined to evaluate their use as biological indicators. Different responses of biofilms to physical, chemical and biological disturbances (e.g. extreme water pH and excess nutrients) are discussed. An annotated list of the methods used for monitoring managed aquatic systems using periphyton is given. The range of methods presented includes methods to determine the general state of biofilms/periphyton as well as specific methods in relation to growth or structure. A combination of methods can be made depending on the type of information required.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on the pros and cons of using periphyton (phototrophic biofilms) as monitoring tools in natural and managed aquatic ecosystems. The structural (biomass, community composition) and physiological (pigment composition, photosynthesis) descriptors of periphyton are critically examined to evaluate their use as biological indicators. Different responses of biofilms to physical, chemical and biological disturbances (e.g. extreme water pH and excess nutrients) are discussed. An annotated list of the methods used for monitoring managed aquatic systems using periphyton is given. The range of methods presented includes methods to determine the general state of biofilms/periphyton as well as specific methods in relation to growth or structure. A combination of methods can be made depending on the type of information required.

Key concepts: Periphyton, Aquatic ecosystem, Biomass (ecology), Environmental science, Ecosystem, Nutrient, Phototroph, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Periphyton as biological indicators in managed aquatic ecosystems. — Research Paper | ScholarLens