1971Review of Educational ResearchRequires access

Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness

Frank Costin, William T. Greenough, Robert J. Menges

Open publisher page 509 citations

Abstract

The past several years have seen a striking increase in attempts to evaluate college teaching. Included in this demand for evaluation has been the widespread use of formal student appraisal of courses and instructors. Several years ago, an extensive survey by Gustad (1961) into the methods of teacher evaluation used by 584 colleges and universities revealed that student ratings were cited most often. More recently, however, Gustad (1967) reported a substantial in the systematic use of student ratings, although he also found that informal student opinions of teaching as well as evaluations by deans and chairmen of departments were frequently used. He suggested that the decline in the use of student ratings was due to the lack of convincing validity data. However, perceived threat to faculty may also be an important cause, since in recent years a strong impetus to use student ratings has come from the students themselves (Werdell, 1967).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The past several years have seen a striking increase in attempts to evaluate college teaching. Included in this demand for evaluation has been the widespread use of formal student appraisal of courses and instructors. Several years ago, an extensive survey by Gustad (1961) into the methods of teacher evaluation used by 584 colleges and universities revealed that student ratings were cited most often. More recently, however, Gustad (1967) reported a substantial in the systematic use of student ratings, although he also found that informal student opinions of teaching as well as evaluations by deans and chairmen of departments were frequently used. He suggested that the decline in the use of student ratings was due to the lack of convincing validity data. However, perceived threat to faculty may also be an important cause, since in recent years a strong impetus to use student ratings has come from the students themselves (Werdell, 1967).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 509 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The past several years have seen a striking increase in attempts to evaluate college teaching. Included in this demand for evaluation has been the widespread use of formal student appraisal of courses and instructors. Several years ago, an extensive survey by Gustad (1961) into the methods of teacher evaluation used by 584 colleges and universities revealed that student ratings were cited most often. More recently, however, Gustad (1967) reported a substantial in the systematic use of student ratings, although he also found that informal student opinions of teaching as well as evaluations by deans and chairmen of departments were frequently used. He suggested that the decline in the use of student ratings was due to the lack of convincing validity data. However, perceived threat to faculty may also be an important cause, since in recent years a strong impetus to use student ratings has come from the students themselves (Werdell, 1967).

Key concepts: Psychology, Medical education, Higher education, Validity, Mathematics education, Psychometrics, Clinical psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness — Research Paper | ScholarLens