2007Unpublished venueRequires access

ECONOMICS AND MARKETING Economic Analysis of Cotton Conservation Tillage Practices in the Mississippi Delta

James E. Hanks, Steven W. Martin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Producers and conservationists are concerned about soil erosion and soil loss. Producers are also concerned about profits. Many studies have examined tillage methods as a means of con-serving soil. Other studies have evaluated cover crops as a means to conserve soils. This paper evaluates a combination of these two methods of soil conservation based on the economic returns associated with each of the defined systems. Field studies were conducted at Stoneville, MS, from 2000 through 2004. Treatments consisted of con-ventional till, no-till, low-till sub-soiling, no-till with a winter wheat cover crop, and low-till sub-soiling with a winter wheat cover crop. Partial

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Producers and conservationists are concerned about soil erosion and soil loss. Producers are also concerned about profits. Many studies have examined tillage methods as a means of con-serving soil. Other studies have evaluated cover crops as a means to conserve soils. This paper evaluates a combination of these two methods of soil conservation based on the economic returns associated with each of the defined systems. Field studies were conducted at Stoneville, MS, from 2000 through 2004. Treatments consisted of con-ventional till, no-till, low-till sub-soiling, no-till with a winter wheat cover crop, and low-till sub-soiling with a winter wheat cover crop. Partial

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Producers and conservationists are concerned about soil erosion and soil loss. Producers are also concerned about profits. Many studies have examined tillage methods as a means of con-serving soil. Other studies have evaluated cover crops as a means to conserve soils. This paper evaluates a combination of these two methods of soil conservation based on the economic returns associated with each of the defined systems. Field studies were conducted at Stoneville, MS, from 2000 through 2004. Treatments consisted of con-ventional till, no-till, low-till sub-soiling, no-till with a winter wheat cover crop, and low-till sub-soiling with a winter wheat cover crop. Partial

Key concepts: Tillage, Cover crop, No-till farming, Mulch-till, Strip-till, Sowing, Agronomy, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ECONOMICS AND MARKETING Economic Analysis of Cotton Conservation Tillage Practices in the Mississippi Delta — Research Paper | ScholarLens