2009•Chonnam Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical Spectrum and Risk Factors for Erosive and Non-erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Young-A Song, Nam-Chul Jin, Kyoung-Ho Ryoo, Dong-Keun Cho, Sun‐Young Park, Kyung-Won Yoon, Hyun‐Soo Kim, Sung-Kyu Choi, Jong‐Sun Rew

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea. Obesity, old age, hiatal hernia, and a high-calorie diet are generally known as risk factors for GERD. But not enough research has been done on the many factors affecting the diagnostic severity of endoscopic esophagitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between endoscopic findings and variable clinical factors in patients with GERD. A retrospective study was performed in 258 patients with heartburn or acid reflux symptoms who underwent endoscopy from January 2005 to April 2008 at Chonnam National University Hospital. Patients were classified in the ERD (erosive reflux disease) or NERD (non-erosive reflux disease) group depending on the presence of erosion. The risk of endoscopic esophagitis was analyzed with regard to several variables, such as symptom severity, age, BMI, presence of endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia (ESEM), smoking, alcohol, caffeine, exercise, Helicobacter pylori, lipid profiles, and use of hypnotics. The incidence of endoscopically suspected NERD was 59.3 % (153 patients) and that of ERD was 40.7 % (105 patients). Hiatal hernia was more frequent in the ERD group [30.1% (31/103)] than in the NERD group [15.7 % (24/153); p=0.006]. Endoscopically suspected Barrett’s esophagus was more frequent in the NERD group [23.5 % (36/153)] than in the ERD group [13.6% (14/103); p=0.049]. Use of hypnotics was more frequent in the ERD group [14.9 % (14/94)] than in the

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea. Obesity, old age, hiatal hernia, and a high-calorie diet are generally known as risk factors for GERD. But not enough research has been done on the many factors affecting the diagnostic severity of endoscopic esophagitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between endoscopic findings and variable clinical factors in patients with GERD. A retrospective study was performed in 258 patients with heartburn or acid reflux symptoms who underwent endoscopy from January 2005 to April 2008 at Chonnam National University Hospital. Patients were classified in the ERD (erosive reflux disease) or NERD (non-erosive reflux disease) group depending on the presence of erosion. The risk of endoscopic esophagitis was analyzed with regard to several variables, such as symptom severity, age, BMI, presence of endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia (ESEM), smoking, alcohol, caffeine, exercise, Helicobacter pylori, lipid profiles, and use of hypnotics. The incidence of endoscopically suspected NERD was 59.3 % (153 patients) and that of ERD was 40.7 % (105 patients). Hiatal hernia was more frequent in the ERD group [30.1% (31/103)] than in the NERD group [15.7 % (24/153); p=0.006]. Endoscopically suspected Barrett’s esophagus was more frequent in the NERD group [23.5 % (36/153)] than in the ERD group [13.6% (14/103); p=0.049]. Use of hypnotics was more frequent in the ERD group [14.9 % (14/94)] than in the

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea. Obesity, old age, hiatal hernia, and a high-calorie diet are generally known as risk factors for GERD. But not enough research has been done on the many factors affecting the diagnostic severity of endoscopic esophagitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between endoscopic findings and variable clinical factors in patients with GERD. A retrospective study was performed in 258 patients with heartburn or acid reflux symptoms who underwent endoscopy from January 2005 to April 2008 at Chonnam National University Hospital. Patients were classified in the ERD (erosive reflux disease) or NERD (non-erosive reflux disease) group depending on the presence of erosion. The risk of endoscopic esophagitis was analyzed with regard to several variables, such as symptom severity, age, BMI, presence of endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia (ESEM), smoking, alcohol, caffeine, exercise, Helicobacter pylori, lipid profiles, and use of hypnotics. The incidence of endoscopically suspected NERD was 59.3 % (153 patients) and that of ERD was 40.7 % (105 patients). Hiatal hernia was more frequent in the ERD group [30.1% (31/103)] than in the NERD group [15.7 % (24/153); p=0.006]. Endoscopically suspected Barrett’s esophagus was more frequent in the NERD group [23.5 % (36/153)] than in the ERD group [13.6% (14/103); p=0.049]. Use of hypnotics was more frequent in the ERD group [14.9 % (14/94)] than in the

Key concepts: Medicine, Reflux, Disease, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Spectrum and Risk Factors for Erosive and Non-erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens