1989JAMARequires access

Passive Smoking on Commercial Airlines-Reply

Margaret E. Mattson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In Reply.— Concerning the comments of Mr Jones, the intention of the study was not to demonstrate the hazardous nature of passive smoke exposure, which has been amply documented elsewhere.1,2Our study demonstrated exposure during the flight to cigarette smoke, which was absorbed and later excreted in the form of cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine. Furthermore, both the degree of exposure to nicotine and the levels of cotinine subsequently excreted were correlated with symptoms of physical irritation as well as annoyance. Second, the purpose of measuring nicotine in the air was because it is a marker of exposure to cigarette smoke. It was not to imply that particular levels of nicotine per se are deleterious. Environmental tobacco smoke contains several thousand chemicals, of which at least 40 are demonstrated carcinogens. These carcinogens are the species of interest for risk-assessment studies. Third, although health information on environmental tobacco smoke is

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Reply.— Concerning the comments of Mr Jones, the intention of the study was not to demonstrate the hazardous nature of passive smoke exposure, which has been amply documented elsewhere.1,2Our study demonstrated exposure during the flight to cigarette smoke, which was absorbed and later excreted in the form of cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine. Furthermore, both the degree of exposure to nicotine and the levels of cotinine subsequently excreted were correlated with symptoms of physical irritation as well as annoyance. Second, the purpose of measuring nicotine in the air was because it is a marker of exposure to cigarette smoke. It was not to imply that particular levels of nicotine per se are deleterious. Environmental tobacco smoke contains several thousand chemicals, of which at least 40 are demonstrated carcinogens. These carcinogens are the species of interest for risk-assessment studies. Third, although health information on environmental tobacco smoke is

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Reply.— Concerning the comments of Mr Jones, the intention of the study was not to demonstrate the hazardous nature of passive smoke exposure, which has been amply documented elsewhere.1,2Our study demonstrated exposure during the flight to cigarette smoke, which was absorbed and later excreted in the form of cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine. Furthermore, both the degree of exposure to nicotine and the levels of cotinine subsequently excreted were correlated with symptoms of physical irritation as well as annoyance. Second, the purpose of measuring nicotine in the air was because it is a marker of exposure to cigarette smoke. It was not to imply that particular levels of nicotine per se are deleterious. Environmental tobacco smoke contains several thousand chemicals, of which at least 40 are demonstrated carcinogens. These carcinogens are the species of interest for risk-assessment studies. Third, although health information on environmental tobacco smoke is

Key concepts: Cotinine, Medicine, Tobacco smoke, Nicotine, Environmental health, Smoke, Cigarette smoke, Carcinogen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Passive Smoking on Commercial Airlines-Reply — Research Paper | ScholarLens