2009Quality EngineeringRequires access

Making Tradeoffs in Designing Scientific Experiments: A Case Study with Multi-Level Factors

Joanne Wendelberger, Leslie M. Moore, Michael S. Hamada

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Experimentation is an important way that scientists learn; i.e., the scientific method. Planning scientific experiments involves a variety of challenges, both statistical and logistical in nature. Interesting statistical questions arise in planning scientific experiments that involve assessing the tradeoffs between the number of runs performed, the selection of experiment factor levels, the ability to estimate effects of different experiment factors, and the degree to which statistical optimality criteria such as orthogonality can be achieved. The relative merits of different types of experiment designs such as fractional factorials, orthogonal arrays, and near-orthogonal arrays for achieving desirable statistical properties need to be considered while facing the realities of practical constraints. These issues are examined as they arise in the process of designing experiments for materials studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Experimentation is an important way that scientists learn; i.e., the scientific method. Planning scientific experiments involves a variety of challenges, both statistical and logistical in nature. Interesting statistical questions arise in planning scientific experiments that involve assessing the tradeoffs between the number of runs performed, the selection of experiment factor levels, the ability to estimate effects of different experiment factors, and the degree to which statistical optimality criteria such as orthogonality can be achieved. The relative merits of different types of experiment designs such as fractional factorials, orthogonal arrays, and near-orthogonal arrays for achieving desirable statistical properties need to be considered while facing the realities of practical constraints. These issues are examined as they arise in the process of designing experiments for materials studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Experimentation is an important way that scientists learn; i.e., the scientific method. Planning scientific experiments involves a variety of challenges, both statistical and logistical in nature. Interesting statistical questions arise in planning scientific experiments that involve assessing the tradeoffs between the number of runs performed, the selection of experiment factor levels, the ability to estimate effects of different experiment factors, and the degree to which statistical optimality criteria such as orthogonality can be achieved. The relative merits of different types of experiment designs such as fractional factorials, orthogonal arrays, and near-orthogonal arrays for achieving desirable statistical properties need to be considered while facing the realities of practical constraints. These issues are examined as they arise in the process of designing experiments for materials studies.

Key concepts: Orthogonality, Design of experiments, Variety (cybernetics), Selection (genetic algorithm), Process (computing), Computer science, Management science, Orthogonal array

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Making Tradeoffs in Designing Scientific Experiments: A Case Study with Multi-Level Factors — Research Paper | ScholarLens