1970PubMedOpen access

What is the best elective operation for duodenal ulcer?

George A. Hallenbeck

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

During the past 40 years, after gastroenterostomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer had been replaced by partial gastrectomy in many centres, partial gastrectomy itself gave way to combinations of vagotomy with gastroenterostomy, pyloroplasty or antrectomy. Opinions differ concerning the procedure of choice and in this paper the author examines the causes of this diversity of opinion and assesses the reliability of conclusions that can be drawn about the elective treatment of duodenal ulcer today. Most reports of results from various operations have come from retrospective studies, and the causes of variability among such reports are analyzed to point out the great difficulty in making a valid judgment about the relative worth of the various operations used to treat duodenal ulcer. Results of some of the few prospective studies with randomized operations assessed blindly are then presented and note is taken of the surprising observation that greatly different operations appear to give remarkably similar results. From the data available the author develops a logical way of approaching the choice of operation for the various problems related to duodenal ulcer that require elective surgical treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the past 40 years, after gastroenterostomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer had been replaced by partial gastrectomy in many centres, partial gastrectomy itself gave way to combinations of vagotomy with gastroenterostomy, pyloroplasty or antrectomy. Opinions differ concerning the procedure of choice and in this paper the author examines the causes of this diversity of opinion and assesses the reliability of conclusions that can be drawn about the elective treatment of duodenal ulcer today. Most reports of results from various operations have come from retrospective studies, and the causes of variability among such reports are analyzed to point out the great difficulty in making a valid judgment about the relative worth of the various operations used to treat duodenal ulcer. Results of some of the few prospective studies with randomized operations assessed blindly are then presented and note is taken of the surprising observation that greatly different operations appear to give remarkably similar results. From the data available the author develops a logical way of approaching the choice of operation for the various problems related to duodenal ulcer that require elective surgical treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the past 40 years, after gastroenterostomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer had been replaced by partial gastrectomy in many centres, partial gastrectomy itself gave way to combinations of vagotomy with gastroenterostomy, pyloroplasty or antrectomy. Opinions differ concerning the procedure of choice and in this paper the author examines the causes of this diversity of opinion and assesses the reliability of conclusions that can be drawn about the elective treatment of duodenal ulcer today. Most reports of results from various operations have come from retrospective studies, and the causes of variability among such reports are analyzed to point out the great difficulty in making a valid judgment about the relative worth of the various operations used to treat duodenal ulcer. Results of some of the few prospective studies with randomized operations assessed blindly are then presented and note is taken of the surprising observation that greatly different operations appear to give remarkably similar results. From the data available the author develops a logical way of approaching the choice of operation for the various problems related to duodenal ulcer that require elective surgical treatment.

Key concepts: Pyloroplasty, Gastroenterostomy, Medicine, Duodenal ulcer, Gastrectomy, Vagotomy, General surgery, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What is the best elective operation for duodenal ulcer? — Research Paper | ScholarLens