2000Unpublished venueRequires access

Community Forest Management vs. Joint Forest Management in Orissa Need to look beyond JFM

Neera M. Singh

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This Paper looks at the conflicts and mis-match between the informal community based forest management systems in Orissa and the Joint Forest Management framework in Orissa. Several thousands villages in Orissa are involved in active protection and management of forests. Most started protecting on their own initiative as their response to forest degradation problem. Orissa has been struggling with the process of formalising these initiatives and bringing them to the ‘Joint Forest Management’ fold. The forest protecting villages, find state promoted Joint Forest Management (JFM) arrangement unacceptable and feel that this does not put the management powers and decision-making in the hands of local communities. This has resulted in tension between formal JFM system and locally evolved Community Forest Management (CFM) arrangements. This paper looks at the nature of this tension and mismatch. It also shares the discussion and the debate amongst NGOs and the civil society in Orissa, on the nature and contours of community-based rights-regime. Using this discussion as the back-drop the paper argues about the need to look beyond JFM and address tenurial issues and institutional issues to strengthen JFM.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This Paper looks at the conflicts and mis-match between the informal community based forest management systems in Orissa and the Joint Forest Management framework in Orissa. Several thousands villages in Orissa are involved in active protection and management of forests. Most started protecting on their own initiative as their response to forest degradation problem. Orissa has been struggling with the process of formalising these initiatives and bringing them to the ‘Joint Forest Management’ fold. The forest protecting villages, find state promoted Joint Forest Management (JFM) arrangement unacceptable and feel that this does not put the management powers and decision-making in the hands of local communities. This has resulted in tension between formal JFM system and locally evolved Community Forest Management (CFM) arrangements. This paper looks at the nature of this tension and mismatch. It also shares the discussion and the debate amongst NGOs and the civil society in Orissa, on the nature and contours of community-based rights-regime. Using this discussion as the back-drop the paper argues about the need to look beyond JFM and address tenurial issues and institutional issues to strengthen JFM.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This Paper looks at the conflicts and mis-match between the informal community based forest management systems in Orissa and the Joint Forest Management framework in Orissa. Several thousands villages in Orissa are involved in active protection and management of forests. Most started protecting on their own initiative as their response to forest degradation problem. Orissa has been struggling with the process of formalising these initiatives and bringing them to the ‘Joint Forest Management’ fold. The forest protecting villages, find state promoted Joint Forest Management (JFM) arrangement unacceptable and feel that this does not put the management powers and decision-making in the hands of local communities. This has resulted in tension between formal JFM system and locally evolved Community Forest Management (CFM) arrangements. This paper looks at the nature of this tension and mismatch. It also shares the discussion and the debate amongst NGOs and the civil society in Orissa, on the nature and contours of community-based rights-regime. Using this discussion as the back-drop the paper argues about the need to look beyond JFM and address tenurial issues and institutional issues to strengthen JFM.

Key concepts: Joint Forest Management, Forest management, Community forestry, Business, Work (physics), Joint (building), Environmental resource management, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Community Forest Management vs. Joint Forest Management in Orissa Need to look beyond JFM — Research Paper | ScholarLens