2005NeurologyRequires access

A new screening tool for cervical dystonia

Rachel Saunders‐Pullman, Jeannie Soto‐Valencia, C. Costan-Toth, Janet Shriberg, Deborah Raymond, Carol A. Derby, Richard B. Lipton, Susan Bressman

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family studies of dystonia may be limited in part by small family size and incomplete ascertainment of dystonia in geographically dispersed families. Further, prevalence estimates of dystonia are believed to be underestimates, as most studies are clinic-based and many individuals do not present to a physician or are misdiagnosed. As a low-cost highly sensitive screening tool is needed to improve case detection for genetic and epidemiologic studies, the authors developed the Beth Israel Dystonia Screen (BIDS), a computer-assisted telephone interview. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and utility of a computer-assisted telephone interview in screening for cervical dystonia. METHODS: The BIDS was administered and videotaped neurologic examinations performed on 193 individuals from 16 families with cervical and cranial dystonia. With use of a final rating of definite dystonia, as determined by video review of a systematic neurologic evaluation, as the gold standard, the predictive value of a subset of questions from the BIDS was assessed. RESULTS: A positive response to at least two of five screening questions had a sensitivity for cervical dystonia of 100% and a specificity of 92%. With use of a positive response to three or more questions, definite dystonia was determined with 81% sensitivity and 97% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Beth Israel Dystonia Screen (BIDS) identifies cervical dystonia with excellent sensitivity and specificity in a family-based sample. The authors recommend the BIDS for family studies, but cross-validation in a population sample is advisable before applying this method to epidemiologic studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Family studies of dystonia may be limited in part by small family size and incomplete ascertainment of dystonia in geographically dispersed families. Further, prevalence estimates of dystonia are believed to be underestimates, as most studies are clinic-based and many individuals do not present to a physician or are misdiagnosed. As a low-cost highly sensitive screening tool is needed to improve case detection for genetic and epidemiologic studies, the authors developed the Beth Israel Dystonia Screen (BIDS), a computer-assisted telephone interview. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and utility of a computer-assisted telephone interview in screening for cervical dystonia. METHODS: The BIDS was administered and videotaped neurologic examinations performed on 193 individuals from 16 families with cervical and cranial dystonia. With use of a final rating of definite dystonia, as determined by video review of a systematic neurologic evaluation, as the gold standard, the predictive value of a subset of questions from the BIDS was assessed. RESULTS: A positive response to at least two of five screening questions had a sensitivity for cervical dystonia of 100% and a specificity of 92%. With use of a positive response to three or more questions, definite dystonia was determined with 81% sensitivity and 97% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Beth Israel Dystonia Screen (BIDS) identifies cervical dystonia with excellent sensitivity and specificity in a family-based sample. The authors recommend the BIDS for family studies, but cross-validation in a population sample is advisable before applying this method to epidemiologic studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Family studies of dystonia may be limited in part by small family size and incomplete ascertainment of dystonia in geographically dispersed families. Further, prevalence estimates of dystonia are believed to be underestimates, as most studies are clinic-based and many individuals do not present to a physician or are misdiagnosed. As a low-cost highly sensitive screening tool is needed to improve case detection for genetic and epidemiologic studies, the authors developed the Beth Israel Dystonia Screen (BIDS), a computer-assisted telephone interview. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and utility of a computer-assisted telephone interview in screening for cervical dystonia. METHODS: The BIDS was administered and videotaped neurologic examinations performed on 193 individuals from 16 families with cervical and cranial dystonia. With use of a final rating of definite dystonia, as determined by video review of a systematic neurologic evaluation, as the gold standard, the predictive value of a subset of questions from the BIDS was assessed. RESULTS: A positive response to at least two of five screening questions had a sensitivity for cervical dystonia of 100% and a specificity of 92%. With use of a positive response to three or more questions, definite dystonia was determined with 81% sensitivity and 97% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Beth Israel Dystonia Screen (BIDS) identifies cervical dystonia with excellent sensitivity and specificity in a family-based sample. The authors recommend the BIDS for family studies, but cross-validation in a population sample is advisable before applying this method to epidemiologic studies.

Key concepts: Cervical dystonia, Dystonia, Gold standard (test), Medicine, Population, Telephone interview, Physical therapy, Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A new screening tool for cervical dystonia — Research Paper | ScholarLens