2005ComputerRequires access

Public opinion's influence on voting system technology

Herb Deutsch

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The US general election in 2000 represents a turning point in elections history. A laborious count and analysis of what was statistically a tie vote in Florida decided the highly scrutinized contest for US president. Simultaneously, voting system standards continued evolving, spurred in part by the introduction of new, high-power technologies. These factors, coupled with an unprecedented level of public scrutiny, changed nearly all aspects of the election process. With its recounts, interpretation of voter intent, and presumed problems related to punch-card voting, the 2000 presidential vote triggered the passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and the massive trend toward direct recording electronic voting systems (DREs). The election process, which had always been taken for granted, now faced intense scrutiny from the media, computer scientists, conspiracy theorists, advocacy groups, and the general public. The US Federal Election Commission approved new voting system standards designed to ensure that election equipment certified for purchase by participating states would be accurate, reliable, and dependable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The US general election in 2000 represents a turning point in elections history. A laborious count and analysis of what was statistically a tie vote in Florida decided the highly scrutinized contest for US president. Simultaneously, voting system standards continued evolving, spurred in part by the introduction of new, high-power technologies. These factors, coupled with an unprecedented level of public scrutiny, changed nearly all aspects of the election process. With its recounts, interpretation of voter intent, and presumed problems related to punch-card voting, the 2000 presidential vote triggered the passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and the massive trend toward direct recording electronic voting systems (DREs). The election process, which had always been taken for granted, now faced intense scrutiny from the media, computer scientists, conspiracy theorists, advocacy groups, and the general public. The US Federal Election Commission approved new voting system standards designed to ensure that election equipment certified for purchase by participating states would be accurate, reliable, and dependable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The US general election in 2000 represents a turning point in elections history. A laborious count and analysis of what was statistically a tie vote in Florida decided the highly scrutinized contest for US president. Simultaneously, voting system standards continued evolving, spurred in part by the introduction of new, high-power technologies. These factors, coupled with an unprecedented level of public scrutiny, changed nearly all aspects of the election process. With its recounts, interpretation of voter intent, and presumed problems related to punch-card voting, the 2000 presidential vote triggered the passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and the massive trend toward direct recording electronic voting systems (DREs). The election process, which had always been taken for granted, now faced intense scrutiny from the media, computer scientists, conspiracy theorists, advocacy groups, and the general public. The US Federal Election Commission approved new voting system standards designed to ensure that election equipment certified for purchase by participating states would be accurate, reliable, and dependable.

Key concepts: Voting, Scrutiny, CONTEST, Electronic voting, Public opinion, First-past-the-post voting, Group voting ticket, Presidential election

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public opinion's influence on voting system technology — Research Paper | ScholarLens