2006•International Journal of Public Sector ManagementRequires access

The distinctiveness of the Welsh partnership agenda

Tom Entwistle

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to consider whether there is significant divergence between the Welsh and English approaches to partnership working. Design/methodology/approach The analysis reported stems from a research project, commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government in 2002, which examined the extent and effectiveness of three‐sector partnerships. The findings from the Welsh study are contrasted with the findings of a number of studies of the modernisation agenda in English local government. Findings First there are increasing numbers of partnership programmes which are born and bred in Wales. Second, Wales has unitary local government and so it does not have the complexity of two‐tier structures which frustrate partnership working in the English shires. Third the Welsh polity is a small one with short and close vertical linkages between national and local actors. Fourth, the engagement with the private and voluntary sectors as political stakeholders is a higher political priority in Wales than the involvement of these sectors in service delivery. These differences mean that partnership has a rather different emphasis in Wales. Research limitations/implications Although focused on Wales, the article raises greater questions about the purposes of partnership working. More work is needed, however, on the measurement of partnership performance. Practical implications The paper raises questions both about the rationale of partnership governance and about the institutional factors likely to influence success. Originality/value The paper contributes to the new research area of comparative patterns of UK governance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose This paper aims to consider whether there is significant divergence between the Welsh and English approaches to partnership working. Design/methodology/approach The analysis reported stems from a research project, commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government in 2002, which examined the extent and effectiveness of three‐sector partnerships. The findings from the Welsh study are contrasted with the findings of a number of studies of the modernisation agenda in English local government. Findings First there are increasing numbers of partnership programmes which are born and bred in Wales. Second, Wales has unitary local government and so it does not have the complexity of two‐tier structures which frustrate partnership working in the English shires. Third the Welsh polity is a small one with short and close vertical linkages between national and local actors. Fourth, the engagement with the private and voluntary sectors as political stakeholders is a higher political priority in Wales than the involvement of these sectors in service delivery. These differences mean that partnership has a rather different emphasis in Wales. Research limitations/implications Although focused on Wales, the article raises greater questions about the purposes of partnership working. More work is needed, however, on the measurement of partnership performance. Practical implications The paper raises questions both about the rationale of partnership governance and about the institutional factors likely to influence success. Originality/value The paper contributes to the new research area of comparative patterns of UK governance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose This paper aims to consider whether there is significant divergence between the Welsh and English approaches to partnership working. Design/methodology/approach The analysis reported stems from a research project, commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government in 2002, which examined the extent and effectiveness of three‐sector partnerships. The findings from the Welsh study are contrasted with the findings of a number of studies of the modernisation agenda in English local government. Findings First there are increasing numbers of partnership programmes which are born and bred in Wales. Second, Wales has unitary local government and so it does not have the complexity of two‐tier structures which frustrate partnership working in the English shires. Third the Welsh polity is a small one with short and close vertical linkages between national and local actors. Fourth, the engagement with the private and voluntary sectors as political stakeholders is a higher political priority in Wales than the involvement of these sectors in service delivery. These differences mean that partnership has a rather different emphasis in Wales. Research limitations/implications Although focused on Wales, the article raises greater questions about the purposes of partnership working. More work is needed, however, on the measurement of partnership performance. Practical implications The paper raises questions both about the rationale of partnership governance and about the institutional factors likely to influence success. Originality/value The paper contributes to the new research area of comparative patterns of UK governance.

Key concepts: Welsh, General partnership, Devolution (biology), Public administration, Government (linguistics), Politics, Corporate governance, Voluntary sector

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The distinctiveness of the Welsh partnership agenda — Research Paper | ScholarLens