Postgraduate journal club as a means of promoting evidence-based obstetrics and gynaecology
Khalid S. Khan
Abstract
Khalid S. Khan
Abstract
We assessed the feasibility of a new educational programme to teach critical appraisal of the medical literature to postgraduate trainees. The new programme used a journal club format where selection of topics and articles was driven by clinical problems arising in day-to-day practice. Papers were appraised critically according to validated guidelines using computer software for appraisal, electronic storage and retrieval. Over the initial 4-month period the journal club produced 17 critically appraised topics, two of which were published in peer-reviewed journals. During the study, trainees' reading time improved from a median of 2.0 hours (range 1-5 hours) to 3.5 hours (range 2-8 hours) (P = 0.026) and their knowledge scores improved from a mean of 50.8 (SD 4.0) to 62.9 (SD 4.3) (P = 0.003). We conclude that a journal club supported by electronic means of critical appraisal and dissemination of appraised information can be used to encourage the practice of evidence-based medicine.
OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We assessed the feasibility of a new educational programme to teach critical appraisal of the medical literature to postgraduate trainees. The new programme used a journal club format where selection of topics and articles was driven by clinical problems arising in day-to-day practice. Papers were appraised critically according to validated guidelines using computer software for appraisal, electronic storage and retrieval. Over the initial 4-month period the journal club produced 17 critically appraised topics, two of which were published in peer-reviewed journals. During the study, trainees' reading time improved from a median of 2.0 hours (range 1-5 hours) to 3.5 hours (range 2-8 hours) (P = 0.026) and their knowledge scores improved from a mean of 50.8 (SD 4.0) to 62.9 (SD 4.3) (P = 0.003). We conclude that a journal club supported by electronic means of critical appraisal and dissemination of appraised information can be used to encourage the practice of evidence-based medicine.
Key concepts: Journal club, Medicine, Critical appraisal, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Club, Medical education, Reading (process), Clinical Practice