2003•OECD Journal on BudgetingRequires access

Public Management Reform

Christopher Pollitt

Open publisher page 792 citations

Abstract

In this paper I want to address some fundamental questions concerning the nature of knowledge about public management reform, and particularly its transferability between countries and contexts. My main point will be that knowledge of what works and what does not tends to be heavily contextdependent. That is to say, a technique or organisational structure which succeeds in one place may fail in another. So – to put it bluntly – there is no set of general tools that can be transferred from one jurisdiction to another, all around the world, with confidence that they will work well every time. This means we have to look carefully at contexts, and at the terms of each time we are thinking of borrowing a good management idea from somewhere else. This is not a how-to-do-it paper. Rather it is a series of reflections on the nature of the trade in public management reforms, drawing on the existing academic literature and seeking to identify issues where further work seems to be desirable...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper I want to address some fundamental questions concerning the nature of knowledge about public management reform, and particularly its transferability between countries and contexts. My main point will be that knowledge of what works and what does not tends to be heavily contextdependent. That is to say, a technique or organisational structure which succeeds in one place may fail in another. So – to put it bluntly – there is no set of general tools that can be transferred from one jurisdiction to another, all around the world, with confidence that they will work well every time. This means we have to look carefully at contexts, and at the terms of each time we are thinking of borrowing a good management idea from somewhere else. This is not a how-to-do-it paper. Rather it is a series of reflections on the nature of the trade in public management reforms, drawing on the existing academic literature and seeking to identify issues where further work seems to be desirable...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 792 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper I want to address some fundamental questions concerning the nature of knowledge about public management reform, and particularly its transferability between countries and contexts. My main point will be that knowledge of what works and what does not tends to be heavily contextdependent. That is to say, a technique or organisational structure which succeeds in one place may fail in another. So – to put it bluntly – there is no set of general tools that can be transferred from one jurisdiction to another, all around the world, with confidence that they will work well every time. This means we have to look carefully at contexts, and at the terms of each time we are thinking of borrowing a good management idea from somewhere else. This is not a how-to-do-it paper. Rather it is a series of reflections on the nature of the trade in public management reforms, drawing on the existing academic literature and seeking to identify issues where further work seems to be desirable...

Key concepts: Work (physics), Jurisdiction, Set (abstract data type), Point (geometry), Transferability, Sociology, Public management, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Management Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens