2010Management DecisionRequires access

Organizational design approaches in management consulting

Klaasjan Visscher, J. Irene. A. Visscher-Voerman

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to map the variety in organizational design approaches, to clarify their differences, and to find out what constitutes good designing in practice. - Design/methodology/approach: A series of in-depth interviews with experienced, high-reputation consultants is used to reconstruct organizational design practice. - Findings: The paper presents a typology with three organizational design approaches, stemming from different theoretical traditions. The paper demonstrates that the three approaches comprise both traditional design activities – analysis, design, implementation, and evaluation – experimental activities, and political activities, but that the emphasis, elaboration, rationale and order of these activities are very different for each approach. - Research limitations/implications: The study provides a framework for further research on the contextualization of design processes, investigating which design approaches work under which conditions. - Practical implications: Practitioners can use the results of this study to clarify, improve and enrich their own approach of organizational designing. Originality/value: Management literature contains many models of organization design processes, but empirical studies of these processes are rare, and not yet existing in the context of management consulting. The paper fills some of the gaps.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to map the variety in organizational design approaches, to clarify their differences, and to find out what constitutes good designing in practice. - Design/methodology/approach: A series of in-depth interviews with experienced, high-reputation consultants is used to reconstruct organizational design practice. - Findings: The paper presents a typology with three organizational design approaches, stemming from different theoretical traditions. The paper demonstrates that the three approaches comprise both traditional design activities – analysis, design, implementation, and evaluation – experimental activities, and political activities, but that the emphasis, elaboration, rationale and order of these activities are very different for each approach. - Research limitations/implications: The study provides a framework for further research on the contextualization of design processes, investigating which design approaches work under which conditions. - Practical implications: Practitioners can use the results of this study to clarify, improve and enrich their own approach of organizational designing. Originality/value: Management literature contains many models of organization design processes, but empirical studies of these processes are rare, and not yet existing in the context of management consulting. The paper fills some of the gaps.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to map the variety in organizational design approaches, to clarify their differences, and to find out what constitutes good designing in practice. - Design/methodology/approach: A series of in-depth interviews with experienced, high-reputation consultants is used to reconstruct organizational design practice. - Findings: The paper presents a typology with three organizational design approaches, stemming from different theoretical traditions. The paper demonstrates that the three approaches comprise both traditional design activities – analysis, design, implementation, and evaluation – experimental activities, and political activities, but that the emphasis, elaboration, rationale and order of these activities are very different for each approach. - Research limitations/implications: The study provides a framework for further research on the contextualization of design processes, investigating which design approaches work under which conditions. - Practical implications: Practitioners can use the results of this study to clarify, improve and enrich their own approach of organizational designing. Originality/value: Management literature contains many models of organization design processes, but empirical studies of these processes are rare, and not yet existing in the context of management consulting. The paper fills some of the gaps.

Key concepts: Contextualization, Originality, Typology, Knowledge management, Organizational architecture, Variety (cybernetics), Context (archaeology), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organizational design approaches in management consulting — Research Paper | ScholarLens