20052005 Tampa, FL July 17-20, 2005Open access

Temporal Subsurface Flow Patterns from Fifteen Years in North-Central Iowa

Matthew J. Helmers, Peter Lawlor, J. L. Baker, S. W. Melvin, Dean Lemke

Open full text 32 citations

Abstract

Subsurface drainage in the Upper Midwest is of importance to agricultural production. However, propermanagement of these systems through in-field management, drainage management, or edge of field practices is needed tolimit negative environmental impacts particularly from nitrate-nitrogen leaching losses. One management practice beingconsidered is drainage management where the outflow of subsurface drainage is managed to conserve water anddecrease the overall outflow of subsurface drainage. To understand how and when drainage management may be utilizedin the upper Midwest it is important to review long-term drainage data to understand the timing, duration, and volumes ofsubsurface drainage in these climates. An on-going drainage study from north-central Iowa allows for reviewing fifteenyears of subsurface drainage which encompasses a range of climatic conditions. This information has been reviewed withthe objective of understanding the timing, duration, and drainage volumes considering temporal drainage flow patterns. Inparticular, the monthly and seasonal flow patterns have been investigated using this long-term drainage record. On thissite with a relatively narrow drain spacing of 7.6 m, drainage volume was approximately 40% of the precipitation. The timeperiod from April through June had approximately 50% of the average annual precipitation and approximately 70% of theaverage annual drainage. In addition, the percent of annual drainage occurring after August 1 was only approximately 7%.The timing of subsurface flow in these areas specifically during the spring coincides with time of planting, crop germination,and early crop development has implications when considering drainage management practices and the effectiveness ofthese practices to limit flow and therefore nitrate-nitrogen leaching losses. To minimize outflow of drainage water, thesedrainage management systems would need to allow for adequate flexibility to ensure crop production while effectivelymanaging subsurface drainage flow to potentially minimize the outflow of water.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Subsurface drainage in the Upper Midwest is of importance to agricultural production. However, propermanagement of these systems through in-field management, drainage management, or edge of field practices is needed tolimit negative environmental impacts particularly from nitrate-nitrogen leaching losses. One management practice beingconsidered is drainage management where the outflow of subsurface drainage is managed to conserve water anddecrease the overall outflow of subsurface drainage. To understand how and when drainage management may be utilizedin the upper Midwest it is important to review long-term drainage data to understand the timing, duration, and volumes ofsubsurface drainage in these climates. An on-going drainage study from north-central Iowa allows for reviewing fifteenyears of subsurface drainage which encompasses a range of climatic conditions. This information has been reviewed withthe objective of understanding the timing, duration, and drainage volumes considering temporal drainage flow patterns. Inparticular, the monthly and seasonal flow patterns have been investigated using this long-term drainage record. On thissite with a relatively narrow drain spacing of 7.6 m, drainage volume was approximately 40% of the precipitation. The timeperiod from April through June had approximately 50% of the average annual precipitation and approximately 70% of theaverage annual drainage. In addition, the percent of annual drainage occurring after August 1 was only approximately 7%.The timing of subsurface flow in these areas specifically during the spring coincides with time of planting, crop germination,and early crop development has implications when considering drainage management practices and the effectiveness ofthese practices to limit flow and therefore nitrate-nitrogen leaching losses. To minimize outflow of drainage water, thesedrainage management systems would need to allow for adequate flexibility to ensure crop production while effectivelymanaging subsurface drainage flow to potentially minimize the outflow of water.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Subsurface drainage in the Upper Midwest is of importance to agricultural production. However, propermanagement of these systems through in-field management, drainage management, or edge of field practices is needed tolimit negative environmental impacts particularly from nitrate-nitrogen leaching losses. One management practice beingconsidered is drainage management where the outflow of subsurface drainage is managed to conserve water anddecrease the overall outflow of subsurface drainage. To understand how and when drainage management may be utilizedin the upper Midwest it is important to review long-term drainage data to understand the timing, duration, and volumes ofsubsurface drainage in these climates. An on-going drainage study from north-central Iowa allows for reviewing fifteenyears of subsurface drainage which encompasses a range of climatic conditions. This information has been reviewed withthe objective of understanding the timing, duration, and drainage volumes considering temporal drainage flow patterns. Inparticular, the monthly and seasonal flow patterns have been investigated using this long-term drainage record. On thissite with a relatively narrow drain spacing of 7.6 m, drainage volume was approximately 40% of the precipitation. The timeperiod from April through June had approximately 50% of the average annual precipitation and approximately 70% of theaverage annual drainage. In addition, the percent of annual drainage occurring after August 1 was only approximately 7%.The timing of subsurface flow in these areas specifically during the spring coincides with time of planting, crop germination,and early crop development has implications when considering drainage management practices and the effectiveness ofthese practices to limit flow and therefore nitrate-nitrogen leaching losses. To minimize outflow of drainage water, thesedrainage management systems would need to allow for adequate flexibility to ensure crop production while effectivelymanaging subsurface drainage flow to potentially minimize the outflow of water.

Key concepts: Drainage, Watertable control, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Outflow, Precipitation, Leaching (pedology), Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Temporal Subsurface Flow Patterns from Fifteen Years in North-Central Iowa — Research Paper | ScholarLens