2000Impact Assessment and Project AppraisalOpen access

A review of refugee environmental-oriented projects in Africa: a case for environmental impact assessment

John O. Kakonge

Open full text 31 citations

Abstract

The refugee situation is examined in relation to its environmental consequences. Few studies apply environmental impact assessment (EIA) techniques to refugee projects and, when they do, it is usually after the camps have been set up. Four important conclusions are that: environmental assessments would provide the data crucial to deciding what local communities and refugees require; environmental education must be locally specific and down-to-earth; a coordinated approach by the various agencies would avoid duplication and waste; and environmental issues must be part of a national framework. The debate will continue as to the impact of refugees on the environment: without empirical data the argument is academic. EIAs would provide the data: EIAs are required for environmentally sound projects. Unsuccessful programs cost as much or more than successful ones: EIAs would increase the success rate. EIAs would be worth the money.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The refugee situation is examined in relation to its environmental consequences. Few studies apply environmental impact assessment (EIA) techniques to refugee projects and, when they do, it is usually after the camps have been set up. Four important conclusions are that: environmental assessments would provide the data crucial to deciding what local communities and refugees require; environmental education must be locally specific and down-to-earth; a coordinated approach by the various agencies would avoid duplication and waste; and environmental issues must be part of a national framework. The debate will continue as to the impact of refugees on the environment: without empirical data the argument is academic. EIAs would provide the data: EIAs are required for environmentally sound projects. Unsuccessful programs cost as much or more than successful ones: EIAs would increase the success rate. EIAs would be worth the money.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The refugee situation is examined in relation to its environmental consequences. Few studies apply environmental impact assessment (EIA) techniques to refugee projects and, when they do, it is usually after the camps have been set up. Four important conclusions are that: environmental assessments would provide the data crucial to deciding what local communities and refugees require; environmental education must be locally specific and down-to-earth; a coordinated approach by the various agencies would avoid duplication and waste; and environmental issues must be part of a national framework. The debate will continue as to the impact of refugees on the environment: without empirical data the argument is academic. EIAs would provide the data: EIAs are required for environmentally sound projects. Unsuccessful programs cost as much or more than successful ones: EIAs would increase the success rate. EIAs would be worth the money.

Key concepts: Refugee, Environmental impact assessment, Environmental planning, Environmental resource management, Political science, Geography, Environmental science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A review of refugee environmental-oriented projects in Africa: a case for environmental impact assessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens