2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Non-renewable Resources and Economic Growth: Comparing the classics to new models of endogenous technology and growth

Sjak Smulders

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The aim of the lecture is to revisit the classic question about the relationship between resource scarcity and economic growth. The new element is that we explicitly study the role of endogenous technological change. In the models we study, growth is driven by R&D-efforts as in endogenous growth theory. We examine under what conditions depletion of non-renewable resources limits economic growth, how substitution between man-made inputs and resources can overcome scarcity limits, and how substitution possibilities and resource depletion affect the incentives to innovate. We first review models of growth driven by non-renewable resource use and exogenous technological change. These models directly build on the classic contributions by Dasgupta/Heal, Solow, and Stiglitz published in 1974. We discuss the role of the elasticity of substitution and that of the rate of technological change. We then turn to new models of endogenous technological change. We examine whether physical capital alone is sufficient to guarantee positive growth, or whether technological change is needed. We also study whether investments in physical capital and in new technology are sustained, such that no exogenous technological change is needed to sustain growth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the lecture is to revisit the classic question about the relationship between resource scarcity and economic growth. The new element is that we explicitly study the role of endogenous technological change. In the models we study, growth is driven by R&D-efforts as in endogenous growth theory. We examine under what conditions depletion of non-renewable resources limits economic growth, how substitution between man-made inputs and resources can overcome scarcity limits, and how substitution possibilities and resource depletion affect the incentives to innovate. We first review models of growth driven by non-renewable resource use and exogenous technological change. These models directly build on the classic contributions by Dasgupta/Heal, Solow, and Stiglitz published in 1974. We discuss the role of the elasticity of substitution and that of the rate of technological change. We then turn to new models of endogenous technological change. We examine whether physical capital alone is sufficient to guarantee positive growth, or whether technological change is needed. We also study whether investments in physical capital and in new technology are sustained, such that no exogenous technological change is needed to sustain growth.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the lecture is to revisit the classic question about the relationship between resource scarcity and economic growth. The new element is that we explicitly study the role of endogenous technological change. In the models we study, growth is driven by R&D-efforts as in endogenous growth theory. We examine under what conditions depletion of non-renewable resources limits economic growth, how substitution between man-made inputs and resources can overcome scarcity limits, and how substitution possibilities and resource depletion affect the incentives to innovate. We first review models of growth driven by non-renewable resource use and exogenous technological change. These models directly build on the classic contributions by Dasgupta/Heal, Solow, and Stiglitz published in 1974. We discuss the role of the elasticity of substitution and that of the rate of technological change. We then turn to new models of endogenous technological change. We examine whether physical capital alone is sufficient to guarantee positive growth, or whether technological change is needed. We also study whether investments in physical capital and in new technology are sustained, such that no exogenous technological change is needed to sustain growth.

Key concepts: Endogenous growth theory, Economics, Technological change, Scarcity, Incentive, Elasticity of substitution, Resource depletion, Technical change

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-renewable Resources and Economic Growth: Comparing the classics to new models of endogenous technology and growth — Research Paper | ScholarLens