2009•Marine Ecology Progress SeriesOpen access

Spatial associations between large baleen whales and their prey in West Greenland

KL Laidre, MP Heide-Jørgensen, Patrick J. Heagerty, Alexandra Cossio, Bradley J. Bergstrom, Malene J. Simon

Open full text 80 citations

Abstract

This study combined data on fin whale Balaenoptera physalus, humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae, minke whale B. acutorostrata, and sei whale B. borealis sightings from large-scale visual aerial and ship-based surveys (248 and 157 sightings, respectively) with synoptic acoustic sampling of krill Meganyctiphanes norvegica and Thysanoessa sp.abundance in September 2005 in West Greenland to examine the relationships between whales and their prey.Krill densities were obtained by converting relationships of volume backscattering strengths at multiple frequencies to a numerical density using an estimate of krill target strength.Krill data were vertically integrated in 25 m depth bins between 0 and 300 m to obtain water column biomass (g m -2 ) and translated to density surfaces using ordinary kriging.Standard regression models (Generalized Additive Modeling, GAM, and Generalized Linear Modeling, GLM) were developed to identify important explanatory variables relating the presence, absence, and density of large whales to the physical and biological environment and different survey platforms.Large baleen whales were concentrated in 3 focal areas: (1) the northern edge of Lille Hellefiske bank between 65 and 67° N, (2) north of Paamiut at 63° N, and (3) in South Greenland between 60 and 61° N.There was a bimodal pattern of mean krill density between depths, with one peak between 50 and 75 m (mean 0.75 g m -2 , SD 2.74) and another between 225 and 275 m (mean 1.2 to 1.3 g m -2 , SD 23 to19).Water column krill biomass was 3 times higher in South Greenland than at any other site along the coast.Total depth-integrated krill biomass was 1.3 × 10 9 (CV 0.11).Models indicated the most important parameter in predicting large baleen whale presence was integrated krill abundance, although this relationship was only significant for sightings obtained on the ship survey.This suggests that a high degree of spatio-temporal synchrony in observations is necessary for quantifying predator-prey relationships.Krill biomass was most predictive of whale presence at depths >150 m, suggesting a threshold depth below which it is energetically optimal for baleen whales to forage on krill in West Greenland.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study combined data on fin whale Balaenoptera physalus, humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae, minke whale B. acutorostrata, and sei whale B. borealis sightings from large-scale visual aerial and ship-based surveys (248 and 157 sightings, respectively) with synoptic acoustic sampling of krill Meganyctiphanes norvegica and Thysanoessa sp.abundance in September 2005 in West Greenland to examine the relationships between whales and their prey.Krill densities were obtained by converting relationships of volume backscattering strengths at multiple frequencies to a numerical density using an estimate of krill target strength.Krill data were vertically integrated in 25 m depth bins between 0 and 300 m to obtain water column biomass (g m -2 ) and translated to density surfaces using ordinary kriging.Standard regression models (Generalized Additive Modeling, GAM, and Generalized Linear Modeling, GLM) were developed to identify important explanatory variables relating the presence, absence, and density of large whales to the physical and biological environment and different survey platforms.Large baleen whales were concentrated in 3 focal areas: (1) the northern edge of Lille Hellefiske bank between 65 and 67° N, (2) north of Paamiut at 63° N, and (3) in South Greenland between 60 and 61° N.There was a bimodal pattern of mean krill density between depths, with one peak between 50 and 75 m (mean 0.75 g m -2 , SD 2.74) and another between 225 and 275 m (mean 1.2 to 1.3 g m -2 , SD 23 to19).Water column krill biomass was 3 times higher in South Greenland than at any other site along the coast.Total depth-integrated krill biomass was 1.3 × 10 9 (CV 0.11).Models indicated the most important parameter in predicting large baleen whale presence was integrated krill abundance, although this relationship was only significant for sightings obtained on the ship survey.This suggests that a high degree of spatio-temporal synchrony in observations is necessary for quantifying predator-prey relationships.Krill biomass was most predictive of whale presence at depths >150 m, suggesting a threshold depth below which it is energetically optimal for baleen whales to forage on krill in West Greenland.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 80 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study combined data on fin whale Balaenoptera physalus, humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae, minke whale B. acutorostrata, and sei whale B. borealis sightings from large-scale visual aerial and ship-based surveys (248 and 157 sightings, respectively) with synoptic acoustic sampling of krill Meganyctiphanes norvegica and Thysanoessa sp.abundance in September 2005 in West Greenland to examine the relationships between whales and their prey.Krill densities were obtained by converting relationships of volume backscattering strengths at multiple frequencies to a numerical density using an estimate of krill target strength.Krill data were vertically integrated in 25 m depth bins between 0 and 300 m to obtain water column biomass (g m -2 ) and translated to density surfaces using ordinary kriging.Standard regression models (Generalized Additive Modeling, GAM, and Generalized Linear Modeling, GLM) were developed to identify important explanatory variables relating the presence, absence, and density of large whales to the physical and biological environment and different survey platforms.Large baleen whales were concentrated in 3 focal areas: (1) the northern edge of Lille Hellefiske bank between 65 and 67° N, (2) north of Paamiut at 63° N, and (3) in South Greenland between 60 and 61° N.There was a bimodal pattern of mean krill density between depths, with one peak between 50 and 75 m (mean 0.75 g m -2 , SD 2.74) and another between 225 and 275 m (mean 1.2 to 1.3 g m -2 , SD 23 to19).Water column krill biomass was 3 times higher in South Greenland than at any other site along the coast.Total depth-integrated krill biomass was 1.3 × 10 9 (CV 0.11).Models indicated the most important parameter in predicting large baleen whale presence was integrated krill abundance, although this relationship was only significant for sightings obtained on the ship survey.This suggests that a high degree of spatio-temporal synchrony in observations is necessary for quantifying predator-prey relationships.Krill biomass was most predictive of whale presence at depths >150 m, suggesting a threshold depth below which it is energetically optimal for baleen whales to forage on krill in West Greenland.

Key concepts: Minke whale, Balaenoptera, Baleen, Krill, Whaling, Whale, Oceanography, Fishery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spatial associations between large baleen whales and their prey in West Greenland — Research Paper | ScholarLens