Transepidermal water loss, temperature and sebum levels on women's facial skin follow characteristic patterns
Sabine Lopez, Isabelle Le Fur, Frédérique Morizot, Guylaine Heuvin, Christiane Guinot, Erwin Tschachler
Abstract
Sabine Lopez, Isabelle Le Fur, Frédérique Morizot, Guylaine Heuvin, Christiane Guinot, Erwin Tschachler
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the biophysical properties of different facial zones. METHODS: We investigated transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin temperature and sebum casual level (CL) on 90 adjacent test sites distributed on the forehead, cheeks and chin of five women. RESULTS: All three parameters showed a symmetrical distribution around the facial median line. Only minor variations of individual values were found within the forehead and the chin areas. In contrast, the cheeks exhibited a distinct gradient with highest values in the paranasal zones and lowest on the cheek bones for all of the three parameters. The mean values on both cheeks of a given individual were nearly identical, and the patterns within the two cheeks were superimposable. Both CL and skin temperature distributions pointed out a "T-zone" with highest values on the forehead, on the chin and on the median part of the cheek. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that biophysical skin properties differ considerably between different facial areas but that they follow a characteristic distribution.
OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the biophysical properties of different facial zones. METHODS: We investigated transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin temperature and sebum casual level (CL) on 90 adjacent test sites distributed on the forehead, cheeks and chin of five women. RESULTS: All three parameters showed a symmetrical distribution around the facial median line. Only minor variations of individual values were found within the forehead and the chin areas. In contrast, the cheeks exhibited a distinct gradient with highest values in the paranasal zones and lowest on the cheek bones for all of the three parameters. The mean values on both cheeks of a given individual were nearly identical, and the patterns within the two cheeks were superimposable. Both CL and skin temperature distributions pointed out a "T-zone" with highest values on the forehead, on the chin and on the median part of the cheek. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that biophysical skin properties differ considerably between different facial areas but that they follow a characteristic distribution.
Key concepts: Chin, Forehead, Cheek, Transepidermal water loss, Nose, Dermatology, Anatomy, Medicine