Variation of whole body averaged phantom specific absorption rate (SAR) in seven different 1.5 T MR systems
Wolfgang Kainz, Florian Fidler, Jean Bobgan, Gregor Schaefers, Roger Luechinger, Nikolaus M. Szeverenyi, Steven R. Wedan
Abstract
Wolfgang Kainz, Florian Fidler, Jean Bobgan, Gregor Schaefers, Roger Luechinger, Nikolaus M. Szeverenyi, Steven R. Wedan
Abstract
This paper evaluates the whole body averaged specific absorption rate (WB-SAR) for a saline-filled standardized phantom in seven different commercial 1.5 T MR systems. Using calorimetry we measured the actual delivered WB-SAR to the phantom. The variability between different MR systems of the actual WB-SAR delivered to the phantom strongly depends on the landmark positions; it ranges for a system estimated WB-SAR of 2 W/kg from 0.6 W/kg at landmark L1 and L2 to 1.2 W/kg for landmark L3. The WB-SAR overestimation ranges from 1.7 to 8.0 depending on the landmark, MR system, and temperature sensor used. The system estimated WB-SAR overestimates the phantom WB-SAR for most cases which can lead to a proportional underestimation of the reported implant heating. Testing in various MR systems using calorimetry to assess the WB-SAR is necessary because of large implant and gel heating variations in different MR systems.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper evaluates the whole body averaged specific absorption rate (WB-SAR) for a saline-filled standardized phantom in seven different commercial 1.5 T MR systems. Using calorimetry we measured the actual delivered WB-SAR to the phantom. The variability between different MR systems of the actual WB-SAR delivered to the phantom strongly depends on the landmark positions; it ranges for a system estimated WB-SAR of 2 W/kg from 0.6 W/kg at landmark L1 and L2 to 1.2 W/kg for landmark L3. The WB-SAR overestimation ranges from 1.7 to 8.0 depending on the landmark, MR system, and temperature sensor used. The system estimated WB-SAR overestimates the phantom WB-SAR for most cases which can lead to a proportional underestimation of the reported implant heating. Testing in various MR systems using calorimetry to assess the WB-SAR is necessary because of large implant and gel heating variations in different MR systems.
Key concepts: Imaging phantom, Specific absorption rate, Landmark, Absorption (acoustics), Biomedical engineering, Materials science, Nuclear medicine, Computer science