Conversion between evapotranspiration references and methods.
James L. Wright, Richard G. Allen, Terry A. Howell
Abstract
Open-access reader
James L. Wright, Richard G. Allen, Terry A. Howell
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ratios of reference evapotranspiration for alfalfa (ET r) and for grass (ET0) are evaluated using\nmeasured ETr and ET,, from lysimeter systems at Kimberly, Idaho and Bushland, Texas. In\naddition, ratios are evaluated using estimates by the Kimberly Penman and ASCE Penman-Monteith\nevapotranspiration methods. An ET reference conversion equation from FAO-56 is\nalso compared. The ASCE-PM and Kimberly Penman methods predict differently for both ET,\nand ET0 so that ratios of ETr / ET° computed from both methods behave differently Ratios of\nETr / ET0 from lysimeter measurements averaged 1.15 at both locations.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Ratios of reference evapotranspiration for alfalfa (ET r) and for grass (ET0) are evaluated using\nmeasured ETr and ET,, from lysimeter systems at Kimberly, Idaho and Bushland, Texas. In\naddition, ratios are evaluated using estimates by the Kimberly Penman and ASCE Penman-Monteith\nevapotranspiration methods. An ET reference conversion equation from FAO-56 is\nalso compared. The ASCE-PM and Kimberly Penman methods predict differently for both ET,\nand ET0 so that ratios of ETr / ET° computed from both methods behave differently Ratios of\nETr / ET0 from lysimeter measurements averaged 1.15 at both locations.
Key concepts: Lysimeter, Evapotranspiration, Penman–Monteith equation, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Forestry, Geography, Ecology