2000Northwest Irrigation & Soils Research Laboratory Publications (United States Department of Agriculture)Open access

Conversion between evapotranspiration references and methods.

James L. Wright, Richard G. Allen, Terry A. Howell

Open full text 34 citations

Abstract

Ratios of reference evapotranspiration for alfalfa (ET r) and for grass (ET0) are evaluated using\nmeasured ETr and ET,, from lysimeter systems at Kimberly, Idaho and Bushland, Texas. In\naddition, ratios are evaluated using estimates by the Kimberly Penman and ASCE Penman-Monteith\nevapotranspiration methods. An ET reference conversion equation from FAO-56 is\nalso compared. The ASCE-PM and Kimberly Penman methods predict differently for both ET,\nand ET0 so that ratios of ETr / ET° computed from both methods behave differently Ratios of\nETr / ET0 from lysimeter measurements averaged 1.15 at both locations.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ratios of reference evapotranspiration for alfalfa (ET r) and for grass (ET0) are evaluated using\nmeasured ETr and ET,, from lysimeter systems at Kimberly, Idaho and Bushland, Texas. In\naddition, ratios are evaluated using estimates by the Kimberly Penman and ASCE Penman-Monteith\nevapotranspiration methods. An ET reference conversion equation from FAO-56 is\nalso compared. The ASCE-PM and Kimberly Penman methods predict differently for both ET,\nand ET0 so that ratios of ETr / ET° computed from both methods behave differently Ratios of\nETr / ET0 from lysimeter measurements averaged 1.15 at both locations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ratios of reference evapotranspiration for alfalfa (ET r) and for grass (ET0) are evaluated using\nmeasured ETr and ET,, from lysimeter systems at Kimberly, Idaho and Bushland, Texas. In\naddition, ratios are evaluated using estimates by the Kimberly Penman and ASCE Penman-Monteith\nevapotranspiration methods. An ET reference conversion equation from FAO-56 is\nalso compared. The ASCE-PM and Kimberly Penman methods predict differently for both ET,\nand ET0 so that ratios of ETr / ET° computed from both methods behave differently Ratios of\nETr / ET0 from lysimeter measurements averaged 1.15 at both locations.

Key concepts: Lysimeter, Evapotranspiration, Penman–Monteith equation, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Forestry, Geography, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conversion between evapotranspiration references and methods. — Research Paper | ScholarLens