2001Journal of PhytopathologyRequires access

Relative Resistance of Four Peach Rootstocks to Phytophthora cactorum and Phytophthora megasperma

T. Thomidis, John Cullum, K. Elena, Steven N. Jeffers

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Shoot samples of four peach rootstocks that are important to the peach industry in Greece: KID I, GF305, GF677, and PR204, were inoculated with Phytophthora cactorum and Phytophthora megasperma in the field and in the glasshouse and were then evaluated with regard to susceptibility. The pathogenicity of P. cactorum and P. megasperma to peach rootstocks was confirmed with an excised twig assay. The peach rootstocks showed differential susceptibility to P. cactorum. GF305 was the least susceptible and KID I was the most susceptible, which suggests that the latter rootstock is unsuitable for orchards in which the conditions are favourable for Phytophthora diseases. GF677 and PR204 were moderately susceptible. The plants that were inoculated with P. megasperma in the field and in the glasshouse showed no sign of infection whereas twigs inoculated in vitro with P. megasperma developed necrosis. GF305 was the most resistant, KID I was the most susceptible and PR204 and GF677 were moderately resistant. The present results demonstrate that none of the four peach rootstocks used in this study was completely resistant to P. cactorum, particularly when rootstocks were flooded periodically to enhance disease development. Therefore an integrated approach including host and resistance cultural practices is recommended to manage diseases caused by P. cactorum in peach orchards in Greece.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Shoot samples of four peach rootstocks that are important to the peach industry in Greece: KID I, GF305, GF677, and PR204, were inoculated with Phytophthora cactorum and Phytophthora megasperma in the field and in the glasshouse and were then evaluated with regard to susceptibility. The pathogenicity of P. cactorum and P. megasperma to peach rootstocks was confirmed with an excised twig assay. The peach rootstocks showed differential susceptibility to P. cactorum. GF305 was the least susceptible and KID I was the most susceptible, which suggests that the latter rootstock is unsuitable for orchards in which the conditions are favourable for Phytophthora diseases. GF677 and PR204 were moderately susceptible. The plants that were inoculated with P. megasperma in the field and in the glasshouse showed no sign of infection whereas twigs inoculated in vitro with P. megasperma developed necrosis. GF305 was the most resistant, KID I was the most susceptible and PR204 and GF677 were moderately resistant. The present results demonstrate that none of the four peach rootstocks used in this study was completely resistant to P. cactorum, particularly when rootstocks were flooded periodically to enhance disease development. Therefore an integrated approach including host and resistance cultural practices is recommended to manage diseases caused by P. cactorum in peach orchards in Greece.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Shoot samples of four peach rootstocks that are important to the peach industry in Greece: KID I, GF305, GF677, and PR204, were inoculated with Phytophthora cactorum and Phytophthora megasperma in the field and in the glasshouse and were then evaluated with regard to susceptibility. The pathogenicity of P. cactorum and P. megasperma to peach rootstocks was confirmed with an excised twig assay. The peach rootstocks showed differential susceptibility to P. cactorum. GF305 was the least susceptible and KID I was the most susceptible, which suggests that the latter rootstock is unsuitable for orchards in which the conditions are favourable for Phytophthora diseases. GF677 and PR204 were moderately susceptible. The plants that were inoculated with P. megasperma in the field and in the glasshouse showed no sign of infection whereas twigs inoculated in vitro with P. megasperma developed necrosis. GF305 was the most resistant, KID I was the most susceptible and PR204 and GF677 were moderately resistant. The present results demonstrate that none of the four peach rootstocks used in this study was completely resistant to P. cactorum, particularly when rootstocks were flooded periodically to enhance disease development. Therefore an integrated approach including host and resistance cultural practices is recommended to manage diseases caused by P. cactorum in peach orchards in Greece.

Key concepts: Phytophthora cactorum, Biology, Rootstock, Phytophthora megasperma, Inoculation, Phytophthora, Horticulture, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relative Resistance of Four Peach Rootstocks to Phytophthora cactorum and Phytophthora megasperma — Research Paper | ScholarLens