2007Unpublished venueRequires access

A Fair Non-repudiation Protocol

Jianying Zhou, Dieter Gollmann

Open publisher page 370 citations

Abstract

A fair non-repudiation protocol should not give the sender of a message an advantage over the receiver, or vice versa. We will present a fair non-repudiation protocol that requires a Trusted Third Party but attempts to minimize its involvement in the execution of the protocol. We will draw particular attention to the nonstandard use of encryption in our protocol and discuss some aspects of its formal verification. 1. Introduction Accountability is an important aspect of information security. In a distributed communication environment, we may therefore want to prevent entities from denying that they have sent or received certain messages. The goal of a non-repudiation service is to collect, maintain, make available, and validate irrefutable evidence regarding the transfer of a message from the originator to the recipient, possibly involving the service of a trusted third party called the Delivery Agent. We distinguish between the following non-repudiation services [8]. ffl Non-repudiat...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A fair non-repudiation protocol should not give the sender of a message an advantage over the receiver, or vice versa. We will present a fair non-repudiation protocol that requires a Trusted Third Party but attempts to minimize its involvement in the execution of the protocol. We will draw particular attention to the nonstandard use of encryption in our protocol and discuss some aspects of its formal verification. 1. Introduction Accountability is an important aspect of information security. In a distributed communication environment, we may therefore want to prevent entities from denying that they have sent or received certain messages. The goal of a non-repudiation service is to collect, maintain, make available, and validate irrefutable evidence regarding the transfer of a message from the originator to the recipient, possibly involving the service of a trusted third party called the Delivery Agent. We distinguish between the following non-repudiation services [8]. ffl Non-repudiat...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 370 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A fair non-repudiation protocol should not give the sender of a message an advantage over the receiver, or vice versa. We will present a fair non-repudiation protocol that requires a Trusted Third Party but attempts to minimize its involvement in the execution of the protocol. We will draw particular attention to the nonstandard use of encryption in our protocol and discuss some aspects of its formal verification. 1. Introduction Accountability is an important aspect of information security. In a distributed communication environment, we may therefore want to prevent entities from denying that they have sent or received certain messages. The goal of a non-repudiation service is to collect, maintain, make available, and validate irrefutable evidence regarding the transfer of a message from the originator to the recipient, possibly involving the service of a trusted third party called the Delivery Agent. We distinguish between the following non-repudiation services [8]. ffl Non-repudiat...

Key concepts: Non-repudiation, Communication source, Protocol (science), Computer science, Trusted third party, Computer security, Cryptographic protocol, Encryption

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Fair Non-repudiation Protocol — Research Paper | ScholarLens