2005International Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde)Requires access

Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments

T. Chudoba, Michael Griepentrog

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract An extensive comparison between the conventional Vickers hardness at 500 mN and indentation hardness measured with Vickers indenters at 500 mN is presented for up to 20 different eaterials and for three different instruments. Additionally, the indentation modulus is compared to Young's modulus, which was measured with alternative methods or taken from the literature. It is shown that the agreement betweef the results from depth-sensing indentation and the reference values can be improved by additional corrections, for the calculation of the indentation area. With corrections the mean hardness difference to the Vickers hardness reference as average of all investigated materaals can be reduced to about 10% although disturbing pile-up or sink-in effects can still not be considered. For the modulus, the mean difference was only about 6%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract An extensive comparison between the conventional Vickers hardness at 500 mN and indentation hardness measured with Vickers indenters at 500 mN is presented for up to 20 different eaterials and for three different instruments. Additionally, the indentation modulus is compared to Young's modulus, which was measured with alternative methods or taken from the literature. It is shown that the agreement betweef the results from depth-sensing indentation and the reference values can be improved by additional corrections, for the calculation of the indentation area. With corrections the mean hardness difference to the Vickers hardness reference as average of all investigated materaals can be reduced to about 10% although disturbing pile-up or sink-in effects can still not be considered. For the modulus, the mean difference was only about 6%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract An extensive comparison between the conventional Vickers hardness at 500 mN and indentation hardness measured with Vickers indenters at 500 mN is presented for up to 20 different eaterials and for three different instruments. Additionally, the indentation modulus is compared to Young's modulus, which was measured with alternative methods or taken from the literature. It is shown that the agreement betweef the results from depth-sensing indentation and the reference values can be improved by additional corrections, for the calculation of the indentation area. With corrections the mean hardness difference to the Vickers hardness reference as average of all investigated materaals can be reduced to about 10% although disturbing pile-up or sink-in effects can still not be considered. For the modulus, the mean difference was only about 6%.

Key concepts: Vickers hardness test, Indentation, Indentation hardness, Materials science, Knoop hardness test, Hardness, Metallurgy, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments — Research Paper | ScholarLens