1986Headache The Journal of Head and Face PainRequires access

Pattern‐Shift Visual Evoked Responses and EEG in Migraine

John M Polich, Cindy L. Ehlers, Donald J. Dalessio

Open publisher page 71 citations

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Visual evoked responses (VERs) and spectral analysis of background EEG were obtained from 20migraine patients and their age‐matched controls. Full‐ and half‐field reversing checkerboardstimulus presentations elicited no substantial differences between the subject groups for any of themajor component (N75, P100, N145) latencies or amplitudes. No VER differences were found forpatient subcategories based on side of headache, symptom history, or age. However, migrainepatients demonstrated slight but significantly higher mean frequency in their background EEG in the4–8 Hz frequencies in leads C 3 ‐P 3 and C 4 ‐P 4 , and a lower mean frequency in the 8–12 Hz band inleads F 3 ‐C 3 and F 4 ‐C 3 relative to controls. The results are discussed and compared to previousstudies of visual evoked potentials and EEG in migraine patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SYNOPSIS Visual evoked responses (VERs) and spectral analysis of background EEG were obtained from 20migraine patients and their age‐matched controls. Full‐ and half‐field reversing checkerboardstimulus presentations elicited no substantial differences between the subject groups for any of themajor component (N75, P100, N145) latencies or amplitudes. No VER differences were found forpatient subcategories based on side of headache, symptom history, or age. However, migrainepatients demonstrated slight but significantly higher mean frequency in their background EEG in the4–8 Hz frequencies in leads C 3 ‐P 3 and C 4 ‐P 4 , and a lower mean frequency in the 8–12 Hz band inleads F 3 ‐C 3 and F 4 ‐C 3 relative to controls. The results are discussed and compared to previousstudies of visual evoked potentials and EEG in migraine patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SYNOPSIS Visual evoked responses (VERs) and spectral analysis of background EEG were obtained from 20migraine patients and their age‐matched controls. Full‐ and half‐field reversing checkerboardstimulus presentations elicited no substantial differences between the subject groups for any of themajor component (N75, P100, N145) latencies or amplitudes. No VER differences were found forpatient subcategories based on side of headache, symptom history, or age. However, migrainepatients demonstrated slight but significantly higher mean frequency in their background EEG in the4–8 Hz frequencies in leads C 3 ‐P 3 and C 4 ‐P 4 , and a lower mean frequency in the 8–12 Hz band inleads F 3 ‐C 3 and F 4 ‐C 3 relative to controls. The results are discussed and compared to previousstudies of visual evoked potentials and EEG in migraine patients.

Key concepts: Electroencephalography, Audiology, Migraine, Visual evoked potentials, Spectral analysis, Visual field, Psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pattern‐Shift Visual Evoked Responses and EEG in Migraine — Research Paper | ScholarLens