Pattern‐Shift Visual Evoked Responses and EEG in Migraine
John M Polich, Cindy L. Ehlers, Donald J. Dalessio
Abstract
John M Polich, Cindy L. Ehlers, Donald J. Dalessio
Abstract
SYNOPSIS Visual evoked responses (VERs) and spectral analysis of background EEG were obtained from 20migraine patients and their age‐matched controls. Full‐ and half‐field reversing checkerboardstimulus presentations elicited no substantial differences between the subject groups for any of themajor component (N75, P100, N145) latencies or amplitudes. No VER differences were found forpatient subcategories based on side of headache, symptom history, or age. However, migrainepatients demonstrated slight but significantly higher mean frequency in their background EEG in the4–8 Hz frequencies in leads C 3 ‐P 3 and C 4 ‐P 4 , and a lower mean frequency in the 8–12 Hz band inleads F 3 ‐C 3 and F 4 ‐C 3 relative to controls. The results are discussed and compared to previousstudies of visual evoked potentials and EEG in migraine patients.
OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
SYNOPSIS Visual evoked responses (VERs) and spectral analysis of background EEG were obtained from 20migraine patients and their age‐matched controls. Full‐ and half‐field reversing checkerboardstimulus presentations elicited no substantial differences between the subject groups for any of themajor component (N75, P100, N145) latencies or amplitudes. No VER differences were found forpatient subcategories based on side of headache, symptom history, or age. However, migrainepatients demonstrated slight but significantly higher mean frequency in their background EEG in the4–8 Hz frequencies in leads C 3 ‐P 3 and C 4 ‐P 4 , and a lower mean frequency in the 8–12 Hz band inleads F 3 ‐C 3 and F 4 ‐C 3 relative to controls. The results are discussed and compared to previousstudies of visual evoked potentials and EEG in migraine patients.
Key concepts: Electroencephalography, Audiology, Migraine, Visual evoked potentials, Spectral analysis, Visual field, Psychology, Medicine