Deprivation of liberty: Mental Capacity Act safeguards versus the Mental Health Act
Ruth Cairns, Genevra Richardson, Matthew Hotopf
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ruth Cairns, Genevra Richardson, Matthew Hotopf
Abstract
Open-access reader
Summary The Mental Capacity Act deprivation of liberty safeguards have been criticised for their complexity and unclear interface with existing mental health law. The new legislation, which was implemented in April 2009, is likely to pose a challenge to clinical teams.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summary The Mental Capacity Act deprivation of liberty safeguards have been criticised for their complexity and unclear interface with existing mental health law. The new legislation, which was implemented in April 2009, is likely to pose a challenge to clinical teams.
Key concepts: Mental capacity, Mental Health Act, Legislation, Mental health, Mental health law, Psychology, Business, Law