2010The PsychiatristOpen access

Deprivation of liberty: Mental Capacity Act safeguards versus the Mental Health Act

Ruth Cairns, Genevra Richardson, Matthew Hotopf

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

Summary The Mental Capacity Act deprivation of liberty safeguards have been criticised for their complexity and unclear interface with existing mental health law. The new legislation, which was implemented in April 2009, is likely to pose a challenge to clinical teams.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary The Mental Capacity Act deprivation of liberty safeguards have been criticised for their complexity and unclear interface with existing mental health law. The new legislation, which was implemented in April 2009, is likely to pose a challenge to clinical teams.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary The Mental Capacity Act deprivation of liberty safeguards have been criticised for their complexity and unclear interface with existing mental health law. The new legislation, which was implemented in April 2009, is likely to pose a challenge to clinical teams.

Key concepts: Mental capacity, Mental Health Act, Legislation, Mental health, Mental health law, Psychology, Business, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Deprivation of liberty: Mental Capacity Act safeguards versus the Mental Health Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens