Exploiting laxity for heterogeneous multiprocessor real-time scheduling
Hamid Tabatabaee, Narges Khatib-Astaneh, Vahid Salmani, Mahdi Salmani, Amin Milani Fard
Abstract
Hamid Tabatabaee, Narges Khatib-Astaneh, Vahid Salmani, Mahdi Salmani, Amin Milani Fard
Abstract
In this paper a new laxity-based algorithm for scheduling real-time tasks on heterogeneous uniform multiprocessors is presented. In the proposed algorithm we have made use of laxity in two ways: Calculating the dynamic priority of tasks, and performing feasibility check. Besides, we have applied processor affinity to reduce the overhead in terms of task migration. The performance of this algorithm is then compared with that of EDF and LLF algorithms. It is shown that our proposed approach not only demonstrates a performance close to that of EDF in non-overloaded conditions but also has supremacy over EDF in overloaded situations in many aspects. Furthermore, it imposes much less overhead on the system.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper a new laxity-based algorithm for scheduling real-time tasks on heterogeneous uniform multiprocessors is presented. In the proposed algorithm we have made use of laxity in two ways: Calculating the dynamic priority of tasks, and performing feasibility check. Besides, we have applied processor affinity to reduce the overhead in terms of task migration. The performance of this algorithm is then compared with that of EDF and LLF algorithms. It is shown that our proposed approach not only demonstrates a performance close to that of EDF in non-overloaded conditions but also has supremacy over EDF in overloaded situations in many aspects. Furthermore, it imposes much less overhead on the system.
Key concepts: Computer science, Multiprocessing, Scheduling (production processes), Overhead (engineering), Parallel computing, Processor scheduling, Multiprocessor scheduling, Task (project management)