Why did Boris Johnson Win the 2012 Mayoral Election
Andrew S. Crines
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andrew S. Crines
Abstract
Open-access reader
This article investigates the rhetorical and oratorical abilities of Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone towards explaining the 2012 London Mayoral election result. This discussion highlights the importance of personality in the election campaign, in particular relation to the impact of the overarching taxation issue. By drawing upon a selection of rhetorical and oratorical devices, this article argues that Johnson won because of a range of issues that included his strong communicative abilities, the inverse failure of Livingstone to engage rhetorically with the electorate, and the corrosive perception of impropriety on the taxation issue. Combined with the overfamiliarity of the London electorate with the Labour candidate, this benefitted Johnson electorally.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article investigates the rhetorical and oratorical abilities of Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone towards explaining the 2012 London Mayoral election result. This discussion highlights the importance of personality in the election campaign, in particular relation to the impact of the overarching taxation issue. By drawing upon a selection of rhetorical and oratorical devices, this article argues that Johnson won because of a range of issues that included his strong communicative abilities, the inverse failure of Livingstone to engage rhetorically with the electorate, and the corrosive perception of impropriety on the taxation issue. Combined with the overfamiliarity of the London electorate with the Labour candidate, this benefitted Johnson electorally.
Key concepts: Appearance of impropriety, Rhetorical question, Relation (database), General election, Sociology, Perception, Political science, Law