2009•Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer ScienceOpen access

Contraction-free Proofs and Finitary Games for Linear Logic

André Hirschowitz, Michel Hirschowitz, Tom Hirschowitz

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

In the standard sequent presentations of Girard's Linear Logic [Girard, J.-Y., Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science 50 (1987), pp. 1–102] (LL), there are two “non-decreasing” rules, where the premises are not smaller than the conclusion, namely the cut and the contraction rules. It is a universal concern to eliminate the cut rule. We show that, using an admissible modification of the tensor rule, contractions can be eliminated, and that cuts can be simultaneously limited to a single initial occurrence. This view leads to a consistent, but incomplete game model for LL with exponentials, which is finitary, in the sense that each play is finite. The game is based on a set of inference rules which does not enjoy cut elimination. Nevertheless, the cut rule is valid in the model.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the standard sequent presentations of Girard's Linear Logic [Girard, J.-Y., Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science 50 (1987), pp. 1–102] (LL), there are two “non-decreasing” rules, where the premises are not smaller than the conclusion, namely the cut and the contraction rules. It is a universal concern to eliminate the cut rule. We show that, using an admissible modification of the tensor rule, contractions can be eliminated, and that cuts can be simultaneously limited to a single initial occurrence. This view leads to a consistent, but incomplete game model for LL with exponentials, which is finitary, in the sense that each play is finite. The game is based on a set of inference rules which does not enjoy cut elimination. Nevertheless, the cut rule is valid in the model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the standard sequent presentations of Girard's Linear Logic [Girard, J.-Y., Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science 50 (1987), pp. 1–102] (LL), there are two “non-decreasing” rules, where the premises are not smaller than the conclusion, namely the cut and the contraction rules. It is a universal concern to eliminate the cut rule. We show that, using an admissible modification of the tensor rule, contractions can be eliminated, and that cuts can be simultaneously limited to a single initial occurrence. This view leads to a consistent, but incomplete game model for LL with exponentials, which is finitary, in the sense that each play is finite. The game is based on a set of inference rules which does not enjoy cut elimination. Nevertheless, the cut rule is valid in the model.

Key concepts: Finitary, Linear logic, Proof calculus, Mathematics, Rule of inference, Cut-elimination theorem, Sequent, Mathematical proof

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contraction-free Proofs and Finitary Games for Linear Logic — Research Paper | ScholarLens