2011Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory DiseaseOpen access

Diagnostics and epidemiology in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Andrew F. Shorr, Chee Man Chan, Marya D. Zilberberg

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common nosocomial complication arising in the intensive care unit. Owing to concerns regarding the excess morbidity related to VAP, multiple interventions for preventing this syndrome exist. Despite controversy regarding the optimal diagnostic approach to VAP, clinicians now face many external pressures to try to reduce, if not eliminate, VAP. In fact, some organizations consider VAP an entirely preventable event. However, any dialog regarding the outcomes and burden of VAP must rest on an understanding and appreciation of both the diagnostic complexities surrounding VAP and the epidemiology of this condition. In addition, the issues of diagnostics and epidemiology are closely linked. The means employed for diagnosing VAP certainly affect the observed prevalence of VAP. Despite these concerns, several general themes emerge in the literature describing VAP epidemiology. First, VAP rates vary based on the diagnostic approach employed. Second, select cohorts of patients are at high risk for VAP, and patient case-mix clearly influences the epidemiology of VAP. Third, rates of VAP appear higher outside the US, irrespective of the diagnostic paradigm utilized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common nosocomial complication arising in the intensive care unit. Owing to concerns regarding the excess morbidity related to VAP, multiple interventions for preventing this syndrome exist. Despite controversy regarding the optimal diagnostic approach to VAP, clinicians now face many external pressures to try to reduce, if not eliminate, VAP. In fact, some organizations consider VAP an entirely preventable event. However, any dialog regarding the outcomes and burden of VAP must rest on an understanding and appreciation of both the diagnostic complexities surrounding VAP and the epidemiology of this condition. In addition, the issues of diagnostics and epidemiology are closely linked. The means employed for diagnosing VAP certainly affect the observed prevalence of VAP. Despite these concerns, several general themes emerge in the literature describing VAP epidemiology. First, VAP rates vary based on the diagnostic approach employed. Second, select cohorts of patients are at high risk for VAP, and patient case-mix clearly influences the epidemiology of VAP. Third, rates of VAP appear higher outside the US, irrespective of the diagnostic paradigm utilized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common nosocomial complication arising in the intensive care unit. Owing to concerns regarding the excess morbidity related to VAP, multiple interventions for preventing this syndrome exist. Despite controversy regarding the optimal diagnostic approach to VAP, clinicians now face many external pressures to try to reduce, if not eliminate, VAP. In fact, some organizations consider VAP an entirely preventable event. However, any dialog regarding the outcomes and burden of VAP must rest on an understanding and appreciation of both the diagnostic complexities surrounding VAP and the epidemiology of this condition. In addition, the issues of diagnostics and epidemiology are closely linked. The means employed for diagnosing VAP certainly affect the observed prevalence of VAP. Despite these concerns, several general themes emerge in the literature describing VAP epidemiology. First, VAP rates vary based on the diagnostic approach employed. Second, select cohorts of patients are at high risk for VAP, and patient case-mix clearly influences the epidemiology of VAP. Third, rates of VAP appear higher outside the US, irrespective of the diagnostic paradigm utilized.

Key concepts: Medicine, Epidemiology, Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intensive care medicine, Pneumonia, Intensive care unit, Psychological intervention, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostics and epidemiology in ventilator-associated pneumonia — Research Paper | ScholarLens