2007Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksOpen access

Indicators of Inequality and Poverty

Sreenivasan Subramanian

Open full text 25 citations

Abstract

In this chapter we shall take a rapid overview of certain salient issues in the measurement of inequality and poverty — two major sources of social ‘illfare’. While the intention is to assign each of the two topics the same importance, this may not be reflected in the final outcome (which seems somewhat to favour ‘poverty’ over ‘inequality’) when judged according to the amount of space allocated to the two topics: the space-allocation pattern, it must be clarified, is largely a function of the expository demands — as they have seemed to present themselves — confronting the author. Both subjects are immensely vast, and built on foundations of considerable philosophical and conceptual import which, however, we shall have little space to review here. The best one can do is to point the interested reader toward Sen’s (1981a, 1992) assessments of the conceptual underpinnings of the notions of poverty and inequality respectively. Our own concerns here will be restricted to issues in measurement , and that, principally though certainly not exclusively, in the space of incomes . This is not so much because of any underlying view to the effect that income is the most relevant dimension in which to measure inequality and poverty, as because this chapter is primarily a survey of the literature; and the literature on inequality and poverty has, as it happens, concerned itself very largely with measurement in the income dimension. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter we shall take a rapid overview of certain salient issues in the measurement of inequality and poverty — two major sources of social ‘illfare’. While the intention is to assign each of the two topics the same importance, this may not be reflected in the final outcome (which seems somewhat to favour ‘poverty’ over ‘inequality’) when judged according to the amount of space allocated to the two topics: the space-allocation pattern, it must be clarified, is largely a function of the expository demands — as they have seemed to present themselves — confronting the author. Both subjects are immensely vast, and built on foundations of considerable philosophical and conceptual import which, however, we shall have little space to review here. The best one can do is to point the interested reader toward Sen’s (1981a, 1992) assessments of the conceptual underpinnings of the notions of poverty and inequality respectively. Our own concerns here will be restricted to issues in measurement , and that, principally though certainly not exclusively, in the space of incomes . This is not so much because of any underlying view to the effect that income is the most relevant dimension in which to measure inequality and poverty, as because this chapter is primarily a survey of the literature; and the literature on inequality and poverty has, as it happens, concerned itself very largely with measurement in the income dimension. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter we shall take a rapid overview of certain salient issues in the measurement of inequality and poverty — two major sources of social ‘illfare’. While the intention is to assign each of the two topics the same importance, this may not be reflected in the final outcome (which seems somewhat to favour ‘poverty’ over ‘inequality’) when judged according to the amount of space allocated to the two topics: the space-allocation pattern, it must be clarified, is largely a function of the expository demands — as they have seemed to present themselves — confronting the author. Both subjects are immensely vast, and built on foundations of considerable philosophical and conceptual import which, however, we shall have little space to review here. The best one can do is to point the interested reader toward Sen’s (1981a, 1992) assessments of the conceptual underpinnings of the notions of poverty and inequality respectively. Our own concerns here will be restricted to issues in measurement , and that, principally though certainly not exclusively, in the space of incomes . This is not so much because of any underlying view to the effect that income is the most relevant dimension in which to measure inequality and poverty, as because this chapter is primarily a survey of the literature; and the literature on inequality and poverty has, as it happens, concerned itself very largely with measurement in the income dimension. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Poverty, Inequality, Dimension (graph theory), Positive economics, Space (punctuation), Salient, Measuring poverty, Economic inequality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Indicators of Inequality and Poverty — Research Paper | ScholarLens