2013Microbiology IndonesiaOpen access

Optimization Modeling of Ethanol Production from Shorgum bicolor Grain: Comparison between Separate Hydrolysis Fermentation and Simultaneous Saccharification Fermentation

Ruth Chrisnasari, DAMIATI HARTINI SUSETYO, ADRIAN PRATAMA SUGIANTO, Tjandra Pantjajani

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Two different process configurations, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), and separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), were compared for ethanol production from Shorgum bicolor grain. Optimization modeling for glucoamylase and Zymomonas mobilis concentration in both of SSF and SHF were carried out to obtain optimal concentration of ethanol production. The optimum condition was achieved using 0.021 % (v/v) of glucoamylase, and 30.19% (v/v) of Z. mobilis for SHF. In contrast, the optimum condition for SSF was 0.021 % (v/v) of glucoamylase and 17.51% (v/v) of Z. mobilis. The model predicted SHF processing to be superior. The superiority of SHF over SSF was confirmed experimentally, the result showed ethanol yield of SHF was 134.80 g L-1 and ethanol yield of SSF was 115.66 g L-1 after 72 h incubation time. A high similarity was observed between the predicted and experimental results, demonstrating the accuracy of the model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two different process configurations, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), and separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), were compared for ethanol production from Shorgum bicolor grain. Optimization modeling for glucoamylase and Zymomonas mobilis concentration in both of SSF and SHF were carried out to obtain optimal concentration of ethanol production. The optimum condition was achieved using 0.021 % (v/v) of glucoamylase, and 30.19% (v/v) of Z. mobilis for SHF. In contrast, the optimum condition for SSF was 0.021 % (v/v) of glucoamylase and 17.51% (v/v) of Z. mobilis. The model predicted SHF processing to be superior. The superiority of SHF over SSF was confirmed experimentally, the result showed ethanol yield of SHF was 134.80 g L-1 and ethanol yield of SSF was 115.66 g L-1 after 72 h incubation time. A high similarity was observed between the predicted and experimental results, demonstrating the accuracy of the model.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two different process configurations, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), and separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), were compared for ethanol production from Shorgum bicolor grain. Optimization modeling for glucoamylase and Zymomonas mobilis concentration in both of SSF and SHF were carried out to obtain optimal concentration of ethanol production. The optimum condition was achieved using 0.021 % (v/v) of glucoamylase, and 30.19% (v/v) of Z. mobilis for SHF. In contrast, the optimum condition for SSF was 0.021 % (v/v) of glucoamylase and 17.51% (v/v) of Z. mobilis. The model predicted SHF processing to be superior. The superiority of SHF over SSF was confirmed experimentally, the result showed ethanol yield of SHF was 134.80 g L-1 and ethanol yield of SSF was 115.66 g L-1 after 72 h incubation time. A high similarity was observed between the predicted and experimental results, demonstrating the accuracy of the model.

Key concepts: Zymomonas mobilis, Fermentation, Hydrolysis, Ethanol, Ethanol fuel, Chemistry, Yield (engineering), Ethanol fermentation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimization Modeling of Ethanol Production from Shorgum bicolor Grain: Comparison between Separate Hydrolysis Fermentation and Simultaneous Saccharification Fermentation — Research Paper | ScholarLens