2002•Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchRequires access

One‐Year Follow‐up of an Implant with Early Radiographic Signs of Loss of Osseointegration: Case Report

Kıvanç Akça, Haldun Iplikciolu

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failures in dental implant treatment are classified as early and late and depend on certain complications. Proposed preventions and treatment modalities for late complications have been comprehensively reviewed in the literature. Since early implant failures are characterized by lack of osseointegration, generally, removal of the implant is suggested to prevent extensive bone loss that would further complicate implant placements in future. PURPOSE: This case report presents the controversy between clinical findings and radiographic examinations in evaluating the nature of contact between an implant surface and the bone during the healing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In one patient scheduled for implant treatment in both jaws, four maxillary and two mandibular implants showed excellent healing, whereas one mandibular implant showed an extensive radiolucent area indicating early failure after 6 weeks of healing. The latter implant was clinically stable and was not removed. RESULTS: Radiographic evaluation 1 year later showed no sign of peri-implant radiolucency of the mandibular implant as seen after primary healing. CONCLUSION: When the bone-implant interface appears to be compromised radiographically but not clinically, such implants may have a favorable prognosis through a currently unknown biologic host response.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Failures in dental implant treatment are classified as early and late and depend on certain complications. Proposed preventions and treatment modalities for late complications have been comprehensively reviewed in the literature. Since early implant failures are characterized by lack of osseointegration, generally, removal of the implant is suggested to prevent extensive bone loss that would further complicate implant placements in future. PURPOSE: This case report presents the controversy between clinical findings and radiographic examinations in evaluating the nature of contact between an implant surface and the bone during the healing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In one patient scheduled for implant treatment in both jaws, four maxillary and two mandibular implants showed excellent healing, whereas one mandibular implant showed an extensive radiolucent area indicating early failure after 6 weeks of healing. The latter implant was clinically stable and was not removed. RESULTS: Radiographic evaluation 1 year later showed no sign of peri-implant radiolucency of the mandibular implant as seen after primary healing. CONCLUSION: When the bone-implant interface appears to be compromised radiographically but not clinically, such implants may have a favorable prognosis through a currently unknown biologic host response.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Failures in dental implant treatment are classified as early and late and depend on certain complications. Proposed preventions and treatment modalities for late complications have been comprehensively reviewed in the literature. Since early implant failures are characterized by lack of osseointegration, generally, removal of the implant is suggested to prevent extensive bone loss that would further complicate implant placements in future. PURPOSE: This case report presents the controversy between clinical findings and radiographic examinations in evaluating the nature of contact between an implant surface and the bone during the healing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In one patient scheduled for implant treatment in both jaws, four maxillary and two mandibular implants showed excellent healing, whereas one mandibular implant showed an extensive radiolucent area indicating early failure after 6 weeks of healing. The latter implant was clinically stable and was not removed. RESULTS: Radiographic evaluation 1 year later showed no sign of peri-implant radiolucency of the mandibular implant as seen after primary healing. CONCLUSION: When the bone-implant interface appears to be compromised radiographically but not clinically, such implants may have a favorable prognosis through a currently unknown biologic host response.

Key concepts: Osseointegration, Medicine, Implant, Radiodensity, Dentistry, Radiography, Implant failure, Dental implant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
One‐Year Follow‐up of an Implant with Early Radiographic Signs of Loss of Osseointegration: Case Report — Research Paper | ScholarLens