On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs
Peter A. Cholak, Carl G. Jockusch, Theodore A. Slaman
Abstract
Peter A. Cholak, Carl G. Jockusch, Theodore A. Slaman
Abstract
Abstract We study the proof–theoretic strength and effective content of the infinite form of Ramsey's theorem for pairs. Let RT k n denote Ramsey's theorem for k –colorings of n –element sets, and let RT <∞ n denote (∀ k )RT k n . Our main result on computability is: For any n ≥ 2 and any computable (recursive) k –coloring of the n –element sets of natural numbers, there is an infinite homogeneous set X with X ″ ≤ T 0 ( n ) . Let I Σ n and B Σ n denote the Σ n induction and bounding schemes, respectively. Adapting the case n = 2 of the above result (where X is low 2 ) to models of arithmetic enables us to show that RCA 0 + I Σ 2 + RT 2 2 is conservative over RCA 0 + I Σ 2 for Π 1 1 statements and that RCA 0 + I Σ 3 + RT <∞ 2 is Π 1 1 -conservative over RCA 0 + I Σ 3 . It follows that RCA 0 + RT 2 2 does not imply B Σ 3 . In contrast, J. Hirst showed that RCA 0 + RT <∞ 2 does imply B Σ 3 , and we include a proof of a slightly strengthened version of this result. It follows that RT <∞ 2 is strictly stronger than RT 2 2 over RCA 0 .
OpenAlex reports 210 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract We study the proof–theoretic strength and effective content of the infinite form of Ramsey's theorem for pairs. Let RT k n denote Ramsey's theorem for k –colorings of n –element sets, and let RT <∞ n denote (∀ k )RT k n . Our main result on computability is: For any n ≥ 2 and any computable (recursive) k –coloring of the n –element sets of natural numbers, there is an infinite homogeneous set X with X ″ ≤ T 0 ( n ) . Let I Σ n and B Σ n denote the Σ n induction and bounding schemes, respectively. Adapting the case n = 2 of the above result (where X is low 2 ) to models of arithmetic enables us to show that RCA 0 + I Σ 2 + RT 2 2 is conservative over RCA 0 + I Σ 2 for Π 1 1 statements and that RCA 0 + I Σ 3 + RT <∞ 2 is Π 1 1 -conservative over RCA 0 + I Σ 3 . It follows that RCA 0 + RT 2 2 does not imply B Σ 3 . In contrast, J. Hirst showed that RCA 0 + RT <∞ 2 does imply B Σ 3 , and we include a proof of a slightly strengthened version of this result. It follows that RT <∞ 2 is strictly stronger than RT 2 2 over RCA 0 .
Key concepts: Mathematics, Combinatorics, Ramsey's theorem, Element (criminal law), Homogeneous, Discrete mathematics, Ramsey theory, Order (exchange)