2005The Journal of Experimental MedicineOpen access

Indecisive interleukin-4?

Heather L. Van Epps

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A study on page 1899 may explain the seemingly fickle ways of the cytokine interleukin (IL)-4. Yao and colleagues show how this quintessential T helper (Th) 2 cytokine can sometimes promote the opposite Th1 response. IL-4 is known as the key cytokine for polarizing naive T cells toward a Th2 phenotype, which is important for antibody production and protection against parasitic infections. Under some conditions, however, IL-4 has been shown to instead induce a Th1 response. Indeed, a recent study showed that mice treated with IL-4 during initial infection with Leishmania major had increased Th1 responses and were protected. If given later, IL-4 increased Th2 responses and exacerbated disease. Figure The prototypic Th2 cytokine IL-4 inhibits IL-10 production by DCs, thereby increasing the production of the Th1-promoting cytokine IL-12. Yao et al. now suggest that the regulation of another cytokine—IL-10—may explain these perplexing observations. They show that dendritic cells (DCs) stimulated in the presence of IL-4 made less IL-10 than those stimulated without IL-4. As a result, the IL-4–treated DCs produced more of the Th1-polarizing cytokine IL-12—known to be inhibited by IL-10—and polarized naive T cells toward a Th1 phenotype more effectively. IL-10 was critical for the increased Th1 response, as IL-4 did not increase IL-12 production or T cell polarization by IL-10–deficient DCs. IL-4 had the opposite effect on B cells, provoking increased IL-10 production. The authors suggest that the differential effect of IL-4 at different times during infection may reflect a switch from DCs to B cells as the predominant cell type that is presenting antigen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study on page 1899 may explain the seemingly fickle ways of the cytokine interleukin (IL)-4. Yao and colleagues show how this quintessential T helper (Th) 2 cytokine can sometimes promote the opposite Th1 response. IL-4 is known as the key cytokine for polarizing naive T cells toward a Th2 phenotype, which is important for antibody production and protection against parasitic infections. Under some conditions, however, IL-4 has been shown to instead induce a Th1 response. Indeed, a recent study showed that mice treated with IL-4 during initial infection with Leishmania major had increased Th1 responses and were protected. If given later, IL-4 increased Th2 responses and exacerbated disease. Figure The prototypic Th2 cytokine IL-4 inhibits IL-10 production by DCs, thereby increasing the production of the Th1-promoting cytokine IL-12. Yao et al. now suggest that the regulation of another cytokine—IL-10—may explain these perplexing observations. They show that dendritic cells (DCs) stimulated in the presence of IL-4 made less IL-10 than those stimulated without IL-4. As a result, the IL-4–treated DCs produced more of the Th1-polarizing cytokine IL-12—known to be inhibited by IL-10—and polarized naive T cells toward a Th1 phenotype more effectively. IL-10 was critical for the increased Th1 response, as IL-4 did not increase IL-12 production or T cell polarization by IL-10–deficient DCs. IL-4 had the opposite effect on B cells, provoking increased IL-10 production. The authors suggest that the differential effect of IL-4 at different times during infection may reflect a switch from DCs to B cells as the predominant cell type that is presenting antigen.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study on page 1899 may explain the seemingly fickle ways of the cytokine interleukin (IL)-4. Yao and colleagues show how this quintessential T helper (Th) 2 cytokine can sometimes promote the opposite Th1 response. IL-4 is known as the key cytokine for polarizing naive T cells toward a Th2 phenotype, which is important for antibody production and protection against parasitic infections. Under some conditions, however, IL-4 has been shown to instead induce a Th1 response. Indeed, a recent study showed that mice treated with IL-4 during initial infection with Leishmania major had increased Th1 responses and were protected. If given later, IL-4 increased Th2 responses and exacerbated disease. Figure The prototypic Th2 cytokine IL-4 inhibits IL-10 production by DCs, thereby increasing the production of the Th1-promoting cytokine IL-12. Yao et al. now suggest that the regulation of another cytokine—IL-10—may explain these perplexing observations. They show that dendritic cells (DCs) stimulated in the presence of IL-4 made less IL-10 than those stimulated without IL-4. As a result, the IL-4–treated DCs produced more of the Th1-polarizing cytokine IL-12—known to be inhibited by IL-10—and polarized naive T cells toward a Th1 phenotype more effectively. IL-10 was critical for the increased Th1 response, as IL-4 did not increase IL-12 production or T cell polarization by IL-10–deficient DCs. IL-4 had the opposite effect on B cells, provoking increased IL-10 production. The authors suggest that the differential effect of IL-4 at different times during infection may reflect a switch from DCs to B cells as the predominant cell type that is presenting antigen.

Key concepts: Cytokine, Immunology, Interleukin 4, Interleukin 10, Leishmania major, Biology, Phenotype, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Indecisive interleukin-4? — Research Paper | ScholarLens