2006•Socio-Environmental Systems ModelingOpen access

Molecular mechanisms involved in induced resistance signaling in Arabidopsis

Corné M. J. Pieterse, Johan A. van Pelt, Bas W. M. Verhagen, Marina De Vos, V.R. van Oosten, Sjoerd Van der Ent, Annemart Koornneef, Marieke H. A. van Hulten, Maria Jose Pozo, Jurriaan Ton, Marcel Dicke, Leendert Cornelis van Loon

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Evolution has provided plants with sophisticated defensive strategies \nto "perceive" attack by pathogens and insects, and to translate that \n"perception" into an appropriate adaptive response. Plant innate \nimmunity is based on a surprisingly complex response that is highly \nflexible in its capacity to recognize and respond to the invader \nencountered. In the past years, we explored Arabidopsis as a model to \nstudy the molecular basis of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance \n(ISR). We discovered novel components of the ISR signaling pathway \nand revealed that priming for augmented expression of pathogenresponsive \ngenes plays an important role in this type of induced \nresistance. Currently our research is also focused on the question: how \nare plants capable of integrating microbial- and insect-induced signals \ninto defense responses that are specifically directed against the attacker? \nThe alarm signals salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene \n(ET) are major regulators of plant defense. Their signaling pathways \ncross-communicate, providing the plant with a regulatory potential to \nfine-tune its defense reaction. We discovered that the regulatory protein \nNPR1 functions as a modulator in cross-talk between SA and JA, \nthereby helping the plant to "decide" which defensive strategy to follow, \ndepending on the type of attacker encountered, and that this function of NPR1 is conserved among Arabidopsis accessions all over the world, \nsuggesting an importany role for plant survival.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Evolution has provided plants with sophisticated defensive strategies \nto "perceive" attack by pathogens and insects, and to translate that \n"perception" into an appropriate adaptive response. Plant innate \nimmunity is based on a surprisingly complex response that is highly \nflexible in its capacity to recognize and respond to the invader \nencountered. In the past years, we explored Arabidopsis as a model to \nstudy the molecular basis of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance \n(ISR). We discovered novel components of the ISR signaling pathway \nand revealed that priming for augmented expression of pathogenresponsive \ngenes plays an important role in this type of induced \nresistance. Currently our research is also focused on the question: how \nare plants capable of integrating microbial- and insect-induced signals \ninto defense responses that are specifically directed against the attacker? \nThe alarm signals salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene \n(ET) are major regulators of plant defense. Their signaling pathways \ncross-communicate, providing the plant with a regulatory potential to \nfine-tune its defense reaction. We discovered that the regulatory protein \nNPR1 functions as a modulator in cross-talk between SA and JA, \nthereby helping the plant to "decide" which defensive strategy to follow, \ndepending on the type of attacker encountered, and that this function of NPR1 is conserved among Arabidopsis accessions all over the world, \nsuggesting an importany role for plant survival.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Evolution has provided plants with sophisticated defensive strategies \nto "perceive" attack by pathogens and insects, and to translate that \n"perception" into an appropriate adaptive response. Plant innate \nimmunity is based on a surprisingly complex response that is highly \nflexible in its capacity to recognize and respond to the invader \nencountered. In the past years, we explored Arabidopsis as a model to \nstudy the molecular basis of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance \n(ISR). We discovered novel components of the ISR signaling pathway \nand revealed that priming for augmented expression of pathogenresponsive \ngenes plays an important role in this type of induced \nresistance. Currently our research is also focused on the question: how \nare plants capable of integrating microbial- and insect-induced signals \ninto defense responses that are specifically directed against the attacker? \nThe alarm signals salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene \n(ET) are major regulators of plant defense. Their signaling pathways \ncross-communicate, providing the plant with a regulatory potential to \nfine-tune its defense reaction. We discovered that the regulatory protein \nNPR1 functions as a modulator in cross-talk between SA and JA, \nthereby helping the plant to "decide" which defensive strategy to follow, \ndepending on the type of attacker encountered, and that this function of NPR1 is conserved among Arabidopsis accessions all over the world, \nsuggesting an importany role for plant survival.

Key concepts: Arabidopsis, Jasmonic acid, NPR1, Plant Immunity, Biology, Systemic acquired resistance, Plant defense against herbivory, Function (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Molecular mechanisms involved in induced resistance signaling in Arabidopsis — Research Paper | ScholarLens