2008Industrial and Organizational PsychologyRequires access

Employee Engagement at the Organizational Level of Analysis

S. Douglas Pugh, Joerg Dietz

Open publisher page 78 citations

Abstract

Macey and Schneider frame the construct of employee engagement at the individual level of analysis, but much of the interest in the practitioner and consulting communities (e.g., Buchanan, 2004; Jamrog, 2004) and several influential academic studies in this domain (e.g., Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002; Salanova, Agut, & Peiro, 2005) are framed and conducted at the organizational level. Macey and Schneider leave the level of analysis issue open but do suggest that adding additional levels of analysis to the research repertoire on employee engage-ment would be a fruitful direction for future research. Because research and practice are already moving in this direction (perhaps ahead of solid theory development), we pro-vide below a brief rationale for why it may be valuable to conceptualize engagement at the organizational level of analysis and offer a few suggestions for how researchers may want to proceed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Macey and Schneider frame the construct of employee engagement at the individual level of analysis, but much of the interest in the practitioner and consulting communities (e.g., Buchanan, 2004; Jamrog, 2004) and several influential academic studies in this domain (e.g., Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002; Salanova, Agut, & Peiro, 2005) are framed and conducted at the organizational level. Macey and Schneider leave the level of analysis issue open but do suggest that adding additional levels of analysis to the research repertoire on employee engage-ment would be a fruitful direction for future research. Because research and practice are already moving in this direction (perhaps ahead of solid theory development), we pro-vide below a brief rationale for why it may be valuable to conceptualize engagement at the organizational level of analysis and offer a few suggestions for how researchers may want to proceed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Macey and Schneider frame the construct of employee engagement at the individual level of analysis, but much of the interest in the practitioner and consulting communities (e.g., Buchanan, 2004; Jamrog, 2004) and several influential academic studies in this domain (e.g., Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002; Salanova, Agut, & Peiro, 2005) are framed and conducted at the organizational level. Macey and Schneider leave the level of analysis issue open but do suggest that adding additional levels of analysis to the research repertoire on employee engage-ment would be a fruitful direction for future research. Because research and practice are already moving in this direction (perhaps ahead of solid theory development), we pro-vide below a brief rationale for why it may be valuable to conceptualize engagement at the organizational level of analysis and offer a few suggestions for how researchers may want to proceed.

Key concepts: Employee engagement, Psychology, Organisation climate, Business, Social psychology, Public relations, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Employee Engagement at the Organizational Level of Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens