2012Living Reviews in European GovernanceOpen access

Civil society participation in EU governance

Eva G. Heidbreder

Open full text 49 citations

Abstract

For the longest time, the participation of civil society has not been an area of interest for neither EU researchers nor political decision-makers.This changed with a rising interest in the democratic credentials of the European Union.With the end of the initial permissive consensus on EU integration, civil society emerged as a possible remedy to bridge the gap between supranational governance and citizens.This Living Review presents the two dominant analytical perspectives on civil society participation: the notion of civil society as organized actors that contribute actively to multilevel governance, and civil society as the mold for an emerging European public sphere.Both these conceptual views are reflected in hands-on initiatives on the EU level.On the one hand, the European Commission in particular promotes the inclusion of organized societal interests in the informal decision-making procedures.On the other hand, various forms of deliberative practices have been introduced that build on the encompassing notion of constituting a trans-European public sphere.The review offers a comprehensive overview on the multiple definitions of civil society and the distinct role attributions these coexisting conceptions imply.The contribution draws a number of critical conclusions on the actual outcomes that the active promotion of civil society participation has thus achieved, and questions whether civil society participation has indeed led to a more grounded legitimacy of EU decisions or a more settled European public sphere.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For the longest time, the participation of civil society has not been an area of interest for neither EU researchers nor political decision-makers.This changed with a rising interest in the democratic credentials of the European Union.With the end of the initial permissive consensus on EU integration, civil society emerged as a possible remedy to bridge the gap between supranational governance and citizens.This Living Review presents the two dominant analytical perspectives on civil society participation: the notion of civil society as organized actors that contribute actively to multilevel governance, and civil society as the mold for an emerging European public sphere.Both these conceptual views are reflected in hands-on initiatives on the EU level.On the one hand, the European Commission in particular promotes the inclusion of organized societal interests in the informal decision-making procedures.On the other hand, various forms of deliberative practices have been introduced that build on the encompassing notion of constituting a trans-European public sphere.The review offers a comprehensive overview on the multiple definitions of civil society and the distinct role attributions these coexisting conceptions imply.The contribution draws a number of critical conclusions on the actual outcomes that the active promotion of civil society participation has thus achieved, and questions whether civil society participation has indeed led to a more grounded legitimacy of EU decisions or a more settled European public sphere.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For the longest time, the participation of civil society has not been an area of interest for neither EU researchers nor political decision-makers.This changed with a rising interest in the democratic credentials of the European Union.With the end of the initial permissive consensus on EU integration, civil society emerged as a possible remedy to bridge the gap between supranational governance and citizens.This Living Review presents the two dominant analytical perspectives on civil society participation: the notion of civil society as organized actors that contribute actively to multilevel governance, and civil society as the mold for an emerging European public sphere.Both these conceptual views are reflected in hands-on initiatives on the EU level.On the one hand, the European Commission in particular promotes the inclusion of organized societal interests in the informal decision-making procedures.On the other hand, various forms of deliberative practices have been introduced that build on the encompassing notion of constituting a trans-European public sphere.The review offers a comprehensive overview on the multiple definitions of civil society and the distinct role attributions these coexisting conceptions imply.The contribution draws a number of critical conclusions on the actual outcomes that the active promotion of civil society participation has thus achieved, and questions whether civil society participation has indeed led to a more grounded legitimacy of EU decisions or a more settled European public sphere.

Key concepts: Civil society, Political science, Corporate governance, Public administration, Business, Law, Politics, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Civil society participation in EU governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens