2013Journal of Educational and Developmental PsychologyOpen access

Parenting Profiles versus Parenting Factors and Adolescents’ Psychological Disorders

Marwan Dwairy, Mona Fayad, Naima Benyaqoub

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

The association between parenting and child’s psychological states has been studied mainly according toBaumrind’s model of authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive parenting styles or according to Rohner’sacceptance-rejection theory. This study, in contrast, rests on the assumption that since parenting is a complex anddynamic process, it is better studied in terms of parenting profiles comprising several factors than via one or twoparenting factors. We administered a questionnaire measuring seven parenting factors that cover various styles ofacceptance and control to 975 male and female adolescents together with a scale of psychological states. Ourresults show that the associations between a parenting factor and psychological states depend on the presence orabsence of other parenting factors, thereby justifying the use of parenting profiles rather than parenting factors.The psychological states were associated with the style of control and the parenting profile rather than with thelevel of control. Two paternal and three maternal parenting profiles were detected, each associated with differentlevels of psychological states. The profile characterized by high acceptance, rational parenting, andloving-control parenting, and by low compassion evoking, love withdrawal, inconsistent parenting, andauthoritarian parenting was associated with better psychological states. The data were analyzed according toparents’ and adolescents’ sex and internalized and externalized psychological states. To learn more about parentalprofiles and psychological states, further research in different cultures is needed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The association between parenting and child’s psychological states has been studied mainly according toBaumrind’s model of authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive parenting styles or according to Rohner’sacceptance-rejection theory. This study, in contrast, rests on the assumption that since parenting is a complex anddynamic process, it is better studied in terms of parenting profiles comprising several factors than via one or twoparenting factors. We administered a questionnaire measuring seven parenting factors that cover various styles ofacceptance and control to 975 male and female adolescents together with a scale of psychological states. Ourresults show that the associations between a parenting factor and psychological states depend on the presence orabsence of other parenting factors, thereby justifying the use of parenting profiles rather than parenting factors.The psychological states were associated with the style of control and the parenting profile rather than with thelevel of control. Two paternal and three maternal parenting profiles were detected, each associated with differentlevels of psychological states. The profile characterized by high acceptance, rational parenting, andloving-control parenting, and by low compassion evoking, love withdrawal, inconsistent parenting, andauthoritarian parenting was associated with better psychological states. The data were analyzed according toparents’ and adolescents’ sex and internalized and externalized psychological states. To learn more about parentalprofiles and psychological states, further research in different cultures is needed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The association between parenting and child’s psychological states has been studied mainly according toBaumrind’s model of authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive parenting styles or according to Rohner’sacceptance-rejection theory. This study, in contrast, rests on the assumption that since parenting is a complex anddynamic process, it is better studied in terms of parenting profiles comprising several factors than via one or twoparenting factors. We administered a questionnaire measuring seven parenting factors that cover various styles ofacceptance and control to 975 male and female adolescents together with a scale of psychological states. Ourresults show that the associations between a parenting factor and psychological states depend on the presence orabsence of other parenting factors, thereby justifying the use of parenting profiles rather than parenting factors.The psychological states were associated with the style of control and the parenting profile rather than with thelevel of control. Two paternal and three maternal parenting profiles were detected, each associated with differentlevels of psychological states. The profile characterized by high acceptance, rational parenting, andloving-control parenting, and by low compassion evoking, love withdrawal, inconsistent parenting, andauthoritarian parenting was associated with better psychological states. The data were analyzed according toparents’ and adolescents’ sex and internalized and externalized psychological states. To learn more about parentalprofiles and psychological states, further research in different cultures is needed.

Key concepts: Permissive, Psychology, Parenting styles, Psychological control, Developmental psychology, Positive parenting, Compassion, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parenting Profiles versus Parenting Factors and Adolescents’ Psychological Disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens