Placebo‐controlled study of ABT‐200 versus fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder
John J. Sramek, Kenneth B. Kashkin, Olga Jasinsky, David Kardatzke, Sara M. Kennedy, Neal R. Cutler
Abstract
John J. Sramek, Kenneth B. Kashkin, Olga Jasinsky, David Kardatzke, Sara M. Kennedy, Neal R. Cutler
Abstract
Abstract ABT‐200 is a novel potential antidepressant which antagonizes both norepi‐nephrine uptake and noradrenergic a2 receptors. This single‐site study conducted over 5 months compared the safely and efficacy of ABT‐200 (titrated up to 280 mg/day) to a fixed dose offluoxetine (20 mg/day) and placebo in 216 patients meeting DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depressive disorder. Following a 1‐week placebo lead‐in phase, patients were randomized to receive ABT‐200 (n = 72), fluoxetine (n = 72), or placebo (n = 72) for 9 weeks of double‐blind treatment. At the end of the study there were no differences (P > 0.05) in HAM‐D total score changes from baseline between ABT‐200‐treated and placebo‐treated patients, whose mean scores were reduced by 4.6 points (16.8%) and 6.4 points (23.3%), respectively. Patients on fluoxetine, however, showed statistically significant improvement over placebo on total HAM‐D scores with a decrease of 8.6 points (30.5%,P < 0.05). While there were no serious adverse events thought to be related to the study drug, 36.1% of ABT‐200 patients discontinued the study due to adverse events, compared to only 5.6% of placebo patients and 4.2% offluoxetine patients. If ABT‐200 produced the spectrum of biochemical effects in humans predicted from preclinical studies, our results suggest that these actions do not lead to antidepressant effects in general depressed outpatient populations. Depression 3:199–203 (1995). © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract ABT‐200 is a novel potential antidepressant which antagonizes both norepi‐nephrine uptake and noradrenergic a2 receptors. This single‐site study conducted over 5 months compared the safely and efficacy of ABT‐200 (titrated up to 280 mg/day) to a fixed dose offluoxetine (20 mg/day) and placebo in 216 patients meeting DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depressive disorder. Following a 1‐week placebo lead‐in phase, patients were randomized to receive ABT‐200 (n = 72), fluoxetine (n = 72), or placebo (n = 72) for 9 weeks of double‐blind treatment. At the end of the study there were no differences (P > 0.05) in HAM‐D total score changes from baseline between ABT‐200‐treated and placebo‐treated patients, whose mean scores were reduced by 4.6 points (16.8%) and 6.4 points (23.3%), respectively. Patients on fluoxetine, however, showed statistically significant improvement over placebo on total HAM‐D scores with a decrease of 8.6 points (30.5%,P < 0.05). While there were no serious adverse events thought to be related to the study drug, 36.1% of ABT‐200 patients discontinued the study due to adverse events, compared to only 5.6% of placebo patients and 4.2% offluoxetine patients. If ABT‐200 produced the spectrum of biochemical effects in humans predicted from preclinical studies, our results suggest that these actions do not lead to antidepressant effects in general depressed outpatient populations. Depression 3:199–203 (1995). © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Key concepts: Placebo, Fluoxetine, Antidepressant, Adverse effect, Major depressive disorder, Internal medicine, Medicine, Depression (economics)