1993Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRequires access

Histological differences in paired biopsies obtained by colposcopic directed punch biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone

P. R. Morgan, John Murdoch, Alberto Lopes, John Monaghan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

SummaryHistological differences between biopsy specimens obtained by punch biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone were studied in 79 patients referred to our colposcopy clinic with abnormal cervical cytology. Cytological abnormalities included mild dyskaryosis (15), moderate dyskaryosis (38) and severe dyskaryosis (26). Patients were entered into the study if there was no cytologicical or colposcopic evidence of invasive disease, they were suitable for local destructive treatment, and were seen by one of three experienced colposcopists. Colposcopy, directed biopsy, and large loop excision of the transformation zone were performed at the same clinic visit. In 50 cases (64 per cent) there was agreement between loop excision and punch biopsy histology. In all cases of disagreement (36 per cent) the punch biopsy underestimated the severity of the lesion. One case of micro-invasive carcinoma was diagnosed by loop excision when, the punch biopsy had demonstrated only CIN III.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SummaryHistological differences between biopsy specimens obtained by punch biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone were studied in 79 patients referred to our colposcopy clinic with abnormal cervical cytology. Cytological abnormalities included mild dyskaryosis (15), moderate dyskaryosis (38) and severe dyskaryosis (26). Patients were entered into the study if there was no cytologicical or colposcopic evidence of invasive disease, they were suitable for local destructive treatment, and were seen by one of three experienced colposcopists. Colposcopy, directed biopsy, and large loop excision of the transformation zone were performed at the same clinic visit. In 50 cases (64 per cent) there was agreement between loop excision and punch biopsy histology. In all cases of disagreement (36 per cent) the punch biopsy underestimated the severity of the lesion. One case of micro-invasive carcinoma was diagnosed by loop excision when, the punch biopsy had demonstrated only CIN III.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SummaryHistological differences between biopsy specimens obtained by punch biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone were studied in 79 patients referred to our colposcopy clinic with abnormal cervical cytology. Cytological abnormalities included mild dyskaryosis (15), moderate dyskaryosis (38) and severe dyskaryosis (26). Patients were entered into the study if there was no cytologicical or colposcopic evidence of invasive disease, they were suitable for local destructive treatment, and were seen by one of three experienced colposcopists. Colposcopy, directed biopsy, and large loop excision of the transformation zone were performed at the same clinic visit. In 50 cases (64 per cent) there was agreement between loop excision and punch biopsy histology. In all cases of disagreement (36 per cent) the punch biopsy underestimated the severity of the lesion. One case of micro-invasive carcinoma was diagnosed by loop excision when, the punch biopsy had demonstrated only CIN III.

Key concepts: Colposcopy, Medicine, Biopsy, Punch Biopsy, Cytology, Lesion, Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Histological differences in paired biopsies obtained by colposcopic directed punch biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone — Research Paper | ScholarLens