2006Journal of SoftwareRequires access

Formal Analysis of Timeliness in Non-Repudiation Protocols

B. Li

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

While SVO logic has been widely used in the analysis of non-repudiation protocols for its simplicity, its lack of the ability in time description makes it helpless in the analysis of timeliness, which is one of the most important properties of non-repudiation protocols. SVO logic is extended by adding a simple time expression and analysis method into it. Then a widely discussed fair non-repudiation proposed by Zhou and Gollmann in 1996 and one of its improvements are analyzed with the newly extended logic. The result shows that Zhou-Gollmann's fair non-repudiation protocol does not provide timeliness while its improvement does. Therefore, the new logic is able to analyze timeliness of non-repudiation protocols. In addition, the new logic can be used to analyze other time-related properties of cryptographic protocols.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While SVO logic has been widely used in the analysis of non-repudiation protocols for its simplicity, its lack of the ability in time description makes it helpless in the analysis of timeliness, which is one of the most important properties of non-repudiation protocols. SVO logic is extended by adding a simple time expression and analysis method into it. Then a widely discussed fair non-repudiation proposed by Zhou and Gollmann in 1996 and one of its improvements are analyzed with the newly extended logic. The result shows that Zhou-Gollmann's fair non-repudiation protocol does not provide timeliness while its improvement does. Therefore, the new logic is able to analyze timeliness of non-repudiation protocols. In addition, the new logic can be used to analyze other time-related properties of cryptographic protocols.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While SVO logic has been widely used in the analysis of non-repudiation protocols for its simplicity, its lack of the ability in time description makes it helpless in the analysis of timeliness, which is one of the most important properties of non-repudiation protocols. SVO logic is extended by adding a simple time expression and analysis method into it. Then a widely discussed fair non-repudiation proposed by Zhou and Gollmann in 1996 and one of its improvements are analyzed with the newly extended logic. The result shows that Zhou-Gollmann's fair non-repudiation protocol does not provide timeliness while its improvement does. Therefore, the new logic is able to analyze timeliness of non-repudiation protocols. In addition, the new logic can be used to analyze other time-related properties of cryptographic protocols.

Key concepts: Non-repudiation, Computer science, Computer security, Encryption

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Formal Analysis of Timeliness in Non-Repudiation Protocols — Research Paper | ScholarLens