2006Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingRequires access

Combinatorial QSAR Modeling of P-Glycoprotein Substrates

Patricia de Cerqueira Lima, Alexander Golbraikh, Scott Oloff, Yun-De Xiao, Alexander Tropsha

Open publisher page 139 citations

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity (property) relationship (QSAR/QSPR) models are typically generated with a single modeling technique using one type of molecular descriptors. Recently, we have begun to explore a combinatorial QSAR approach which employs various combinations of optimization methods and descriptor types and includes rigorous and consistent model validation (Kovatcheva, A.; Golbraikh, A.; Oloff, S.; Xiao, Y.; Zheng, W.; Wolschann, P.; Buchbauer, G.; Tropsha, A. Combinatorial QSAR of Ambergris Fragrance Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 582-95). Herein, we have applied this approach to a data set of 195 diverse substrates and nonsubstrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) that plays a crucial role in drug resistance. Modeling methods included k-nearest neighbors classification, decision tree, binary QSAR, and support vector machines (SVM). Descriptor sets included molecular connectivity indices, atom pair (AP) descriptors, VolSurf descriptors, and molecular operation environment descriptors. Each descriptor type was used with every QSAR modeling technique; so, in total, 16 combinations of techniques and descriptor types have been considered. Although all combinations resulted in models with a high correct classification rate for the training set (CCR(train)), not all of them had high classification accuracy for the test set (CCR(test)). Thus, predictive models have been generated only for some combinations of the methods and descriptor types, and the best models were obtained using SVM classification with either AP or VolSurf descriptors; they were characterized by CCR(train) = 0.94 and 0.88 and CCR(test) = 0.81 and 0.81, respectively. The combinatorial QSAR approach identified models with higher predictive accuracy than those reported previously for the same data set. We suggest that, in the absence of any universally applicable "one-for-all" QSAR methodology, the combinatorial QSAR approach should become the standard practice in QSPR/QSAR modeling.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Quantitative structure-activity (property) relationship (QSAR/QSPR) models are typically generated with a single modeling technique using one type of molecular descriptors. Recently, we have begun to explore a combinatorial QSAR approach which employs various combinations of optimization methods and descriptor types and includes rigorous and consistent model validation (Kovatcheva, A.; Golbraikh, A.; Oloff, S.; Xiao, Y.; Zheng, W.; Wolschann, P.; Buchbauer, G.; Tropsha, A. Combinatorial QSAR of Ambergris Fragrance Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 582-95). Herein, we have applied this approach to a data set of 195 diverse substrates and nonsubstrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) that plays a crucial role in drug resistance. Modeling methods included k-nearest neighbors classification, decision tree, binary QSAR, and support vector machines (SVM). Descriptor sets included molecular connectivity indices, atom pair (AP) descriptors, VolSurf descriptors, and molecular operation environment descriptors. Each descriptor type was used with every QSAR modeling technique; so, in total, 16 combinations of techniques and descriptor types have been considered. Although all combinations resulted in models with a high correct classification rate for the training set (CCR(train)), not all of them had high classification accuracy for the test set (CCR(test)). Thus, predictive models have been generated only for some combinations of the methods and descriptor types, and the best models were obtained using SVM classification with either AP or VolSurf descriptors; they were characterized by CCR(train) = 0.94 and 0.88 and CCR(test) = 0.81 and 0.81, respectively. The combinatorial QSAR approach identified models with higher predictive accuracy than those reported previously for the same data set. We suggest that, in the absence of any universally applicable "one-for-all" QSAR methodology, the combinatorial QSAR approach should become the standard practice in QSPR/QSAR modeling.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 139 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Quantitative structure-activity (property) relationship (QSAR/QSPR) models are typically generated with a single modeling technique using one type of molecular descriptors. Recently, we have begun to explore a combinatorial QSAR approach which employs various combinations of optimization methods and descriptor types and includes rigorous and consistent model validation (Kovatcheva, A.; Golbraikh, A.; Oloff, S.; Xiao, Y.; Zheng, W.; Wolschann, P.; Buchbauer, G.; Tropsha, A. Combinatorial QSAR of Ambergris Fragrance Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 582-95). Herein, we have applied this approach to a data set of 195 diverse substrates and nonsubstrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) that plays a crucial role in drug resistance. Modeling methods included k-nearest neighbors classification, decision tree, binary QSAR, and support vector machines (SVM). Descriptor sets included molecular connectivity indices, atom pair (AP) descriptors, VolSurf descriptors, and molecular operation environment descriptors. Each descriptor type was used with every QSAR modeling technique; so, in total, 16 combinations of techniques and descriptor types have been considered. Although all combinations resulted in models with a high correct classification rate for the training set (CCR(train)), not all of them had high classification accuracy for the test set (CCR(test)). Thus, predictive models have been generated only for some combinations of the methods and descriptor types, and the best models were obtained using SVM classification with either AP or VolSurf descriptors; they were characterized by CCR(train) = 0.94 and 0.88 and CCR(test) = 0.81 and 0.81, respectively. The combinatorial QSAR approach identified models with higher predictive accuracy than those reported previously for the same data set. We suggest that, in the absence of any universally applicable "one-for-all" QSAR methodology, the combinatorial QSAR approach should become the standard practice in QSPR/QSAR modeling.

Key concepts: Quantitative structure–activity relationship, Computational biology, Glycoprotein, P-glycoprotein, Chemistry, Computer science, Stereochemistry, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Combinatorial QSAR Modeling of P-Glycoprotein Substrates — Research Paper | ScholarLens