2009ORLRequires access

Electrode Interaction in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Comparison of Straight and Contour Electrode Arrays

Xin Xi, Fei Ji, Dongyi Han, Mengdi Hong, Aiting Chen

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

The degree of overlap among cochlear nerve fibers stimulated by different electrodes results in electrode interaction, which has been shown to have a significantly deleterious effect on speech recognition performance in multi-electrode cochlear implant users. The Nucleus CI24R(CS) Contour array, which lies substantially closer to the modiolus than the CI24M straight array, is expected to exhibit narrower excitation patterns. The neural response telemetry (NRT) 3.0 software provides a method of measuring the spread of neural excitation by presenting the masker and probe pulses on different intra-cochlear electrode bands. Nine pairs of children, using Nucleus CI24M/CI24R(CS) cochlear implants with a similar etiology and duration of deafness, insertion depth, age of implantation and loudest acceptable presentation level (LAPL) in NRT sessions, participated in the study. Profiles of the spread of neural excitation stimulated at the LAPL at 3 probe locations were examined for each pair of the 2 types of electrode array. The spread of neural excitation with respect to array type and location revealed significant effects (p < 0.001; p = 0.002) and no interaction between array type and probe location (p = 0.559). The results demonstrated that the Contour array improved electrode discrimination, especially for the electrodes at the basal end of the cochlea. The findings have implications for future electrode array design and current implant mapping strategies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The degree of overlap among cochlear nerve fibers stimulated by different electrodes results in electrode interaction, which has been shown to have a significantly deleterious effect on speech recognition performance in multi-electrode cochlear implant users. The Nucleus CI24R(CS) Contour array, which lies substantially closer to the modiolus than the CI24M straight array, is expected to exhibit narrower excitation patterns. The neural response telemetry (NRT) 3.0 software provides a method of measuring the spread of neural excitation by presenting the masker and probe pulses on different intra-cochlear electrode bands. Nine pairs of children, using Nucleus CI24M/CI24R(CS) cochlear implants with a similar etiology and duration of deafness, insertion depth, age of implantation and loudest acceptable presentation level (LAPL) in NRT sessions, participated in the study. Profiles of the spread of neural excitation stimulated at the LAPL at 3 probe locations were examined for each pair of the 2 types of electrode array. The spread of neural excitation with respect to array type and location revealed significant effects (p < 0.001; p = 0.002) and no interaction between array type and probe location (p = 0.559). The results demonstrated that the Contour array improved electrode discrimination, especially for the electrodes at the basal end of the cochlea. The findings have implications for future electrode array design and current implant mapping strategies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The degree of overlap among cochlear nerve fibers stimulated by different electrodes results in electrode interaction, which has been shown to have a significantly deleterious effect on speech recognition performance in multi-electrode cochlear implant users. The Nucleus CI24R(CS) Contour array, which lies substantially closer to the modiolus than the CI24M straight array, is expected to exhibit narrower excitation patterns. The neural response telemetry (NRT) 3.0 software provides a method of measuring the spread of neural excitation by presenting the masker and probe pulses on different intra-cochlear electrode bands. Nine pairs of children, using Nucleus CI24M/CI24R(CS) cochlear implants with a similar etiology and duration of deafness, insertion depth, age of implantation and loudest acceptable presentation level (LAPL) in NRT sessions, participated in the study. Profiles of the spread of neural excitation stimulated at the LAPL at 3 probe locations were examined for each pair of the 2 types of electrode array. The spread of neural excitation with respect to array type and location revealed significant effects (p < 0.001; p = 0.002) and no interaction between array type and probe location (p = 0.559). The results demonstrated that the Contour array improved electrode discrimination, especially for the electrodes at the basal end of the cochlea. The findings have implications for future electrode array design and current implant mapping strategies.

Key concepts: Cochlear implant, Electrode array, Electrode, Modiolus (cochlea), Cochlea, Materials science, Cochlear nucleus, Biomedical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electrode Interaction in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Comparison of Straight and Contour Electrode Arrays — Research Paper | ScholarLens