ScholarLens Back to search
2013•Tobacco ControlOpen access

Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?

Graeme Docherty, Sarah Lewis, Andy McEwen, Linda Bauld, Tim Coleman

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases

Key concepts: Quitline, Randomized controlled trial, Smoking cessation, Medicine, Table (database), Family medicine, Computer science, Internal medicine

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? — Research Paper | ScholarLens