Efficiency VS. irradiance characterization of PV modules requires angle-of-incidence and spectral corrections
Matthew M. Donovan, Benjamin Bourne, Jeffrey Roche
Abstract
Matthew M. Donovan, Benjamin Bourne, Jeffrey Roche
Abstract
Photovoltaic simulation tools vary in the way they model efficiency as a function of irradiance. These differences are particularly evident at low irradiance below 500 W/m2, however these differences have a significant effect on annual yield. Field validation of efficiency vs irradiance is complicated by the fact that low irradiance is associated with high airmass and/or high angles of incidence which affect both the irradiance sensor and the module response. In this paper we demonstrate that characterization of module efficiency vs. irradiance profile is dependent on the testing conditions and type of irradiance sensor used to make the measurement. We demonstrate a method based on the Sandia Model to correct the irradiance measurement for spectrum and angle-of-incidence effects. We demonstrate this method for two irradiance sensors and two module technologies, and show that the analysis is greatly simplified (resulting in less uncertainty) when using a spectrally matched reference cell. Finally, we show that the impact of simulating PV production using uncorrected model inputs can impact annual yield by as much as 4.5%.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Photovoltaic simulation tools vary in the way they model efficiency as a function of irradiance. These differences are particularly evident at low irradiance below 500 W/m2, however these differences have a significant effect on annual yield. Field validation of efficiency vs irradiance is complicated by the fact that low irradiance is associated with high airmass and/or high angles of incidence which affect both the irradiance sensor and the module response. In this paper we demonstrate that characterization of module efficiency vs. irradiance profile is dependent on the testing conditions and type of irradiance sensor used to make the measurement. We demonstrate a method based on the Sandia Model to correct the irradiance measurement for spectrum and angle-of-incidence effects. We demonstrate this method for two irradiance sensors and two module technologies, and show that the analysis is greatly simplified (resulting in less uncertainty) when using a spectrally matched reference cell. Finally, we show that the impact of simulating PV production using uncorrected model inputs can impact annual yield by as much as 4.5%.
Key concepts: Irradiance, Solar irradiance, Photovoltaic system, Angle of incidence (optics), Environmental science, Remote sensing, Optics, Computer science