2011Journal of Computer Assisted LearningRequires access

Interaction in asynchronous discussion forums: peer facilitation techniques

Connie S. L. Ng, Wing‐Sum Cheung, Khe Foon Hew

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

Abstract Peer facilitation is proposed as a solution to counter limited interaction in asynchronous online discussions. However, there is a lack of empirical research on online peer facilitation. This study identifies, through cross‐case comparison of two graduate‐level blended courses attended by Asian Pacific students, the actual peer facilitation techniques that could encourage online interaction. Analyses of interviews and online discussion transcripts suggest that techniques such as ‘showing appreciation’ and ‘considering others' viewpoints’ encourage online interaction. However, instructors intending to incorporate peer‐facilitated online discussions should also consider the influence of factors such as the design of the online discussion activity and learners' cultural background as some participants could consider challenging others' ideas culturally inappropriate and need to be encouraged through techniques such as ‘general invitation to contribute’. Facilitators might also re‐consider the use of certain traditionally recommended strategies such as directing an online message at specific participants to encourage responses. This study suggests that doing so could sometimes backfire and discourage online contributions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Peer facilitation is proposed as a solution to counter limited interaction in asynchronous online discussions. However, there is a lack of empirical research on online peer facilitation. This study identifies, through cross‐case comparison of two graduate‐level blended courses attended by Asian Pacific students, the actual peer facilitation techniques that could encourage online interaction. Analyses of interviews and online discussion transcripts suggest that techniques such as ‘showing appreciation’ and ‘considering others' viewpoints’ encourage online interaction. However, instructors intending to incorporate peer‐facilitated online discussions should also consider the influence of factors such as the design of the online discussion activity and learners' cultural background as some participants could consider challenging others' ideas culturally inappropriate and need to be encouraged through techniques such as ‘general invitation to contribute’. Facilitators might also re‐consider the use of certain traditionally recommended strategies such as directing an online message at specific participants to encourage responses. This study suggests that doing so could sometimes backfire and discourage online contributions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Peer facilitation is proposed as a solution to counter limited interaction in asynchronous online discussions. However, there is a lack of empirical research on online peer facilitation. This study identifies, through cross‐case comparison of two graduate‐level blended courses attended by Asian Pacific students, the actual peer facilitation techniques that could encourage online interaction. Analyses of interviews and online discussion transcripts suggest that techniques such as ‘showing appreciation’ and ‘considering others' viewpoints’ encourage online interaction. However, instructors intending to incorporate peer‐facilitated online discussions should also consider the influence of factors such as the design of the online discussion activity and learners' cultural background as some participants could consider challenging others' ideas culturally inappropriate and need to be encouraged through techniques such as ‘general invitation to contribute’. Facilitators might also re‐consider the use of certain traditionally recommended strategies such as directing an online message at specific participants to encourage responses. This study suggests that doing so could sometimes backfire and discourage online contributions.

Key concepts: Facilitation, Asynchronous communication, Viewpoints, Computer-mediated communication, Online discussion, Psychology, Social facilitation, Online participation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interaction in asynchronous discussion forums: peer facilitation techniques — Research Paper | ScholarLens